These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38073579)

  • 1. Combining Mendelian randomization with the sibling comparison design.
    Sjölander A; Frisell T; Öberg S; Wang Y; Hägg S
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):731-755. PubMed ID: 38073579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
    Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leveraging family data to design Mendelian randomization that is provably robust to population stratification.
    LaPierre N; Fu B; Turnbull S; Eskin E; Sankararaman S
    Genome Res; 2023 Jul; 33(7):1032-1041. PubMed ID: 37197991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conditioning on parental mating types can reduce necessary assumptions for Mendelian randomization.
    Ejima K; Liu N; Mestre LM; de Los Campos G; Allison DB
    Front Genet; 2023; 14():1014014. PubMed ID: 36950138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
    Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Credible Mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions.
    Glymour MM; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 22247045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
    Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias and mean squared error in Mendelian randomization with invalid instrumental variables.
    Deng L; Fu S; Yu K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 48(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 37970963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption.
    Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Zhao Q; Lawlor DA; Sheehan NA; Thompson J; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 48(3):728-742. PubMed ID: 30561657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mendelian randomization in health research: using appropriate genetic variants and avoiding biased estimates.
    Taylor AE; Davies NM; Ware JJ; VanderWeele T; Smith GD; Munafò MR
    Econ Hum Biol; 2014 Mar; 13(100):99-106. PubMed ID: 24388127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the instrumental inequalities in simulated mendelian randomization analyses with coarsened exposures.
    Diemer EW; Shi J; Hernan MA; Swanson SA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 38819552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approximation of bias and mean-squared error in two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses.
    Deng L; Zhang H; Song L; Yu K
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):369-379. PubMed ID: 31651042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses.
    Brumpton B; Sanderson E; Heilbron K; Hartwig FP; Harrison S; Vie GÅ; Cho Y; Howe LD; Hughes A; Boomsma DI; Havdahl A; Hopper J; Neale M; Nivard MG; Pedersen NL; Reynolds CA; Tucker-Drob EM; Grotzinger A; Howe L; Morris T; Li S; ; ; Auton A; Windmeijer F; Chen WM; Bjørngaard JH; Hveem K; Willer C; Evans DM; Kaprio J; Davey Smith G; Åsvold BO; Hemani G; Davies NM
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3519. PubMed ID: 32665587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
    Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Leveraging family data to design Mendelian Randomization that is provably robust to population stratification.
    LaPierre N; Fu B; Turnbull S; Eskin E; Sankararaman S
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36711635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
    Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.