These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38073604)

  • 1. Optimal weighted Bonferroni tests and their graphical extensions.
    Xi D; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):475-500. PubMed ID: 38073604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighted multiple hypothesis testing procedures.
    Kang G; Ye K; Liu N; Allison DB; Gao G
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8(1):Article23. PubMed ID: 19409067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing Graphical Procedures for Multiplicity Control in a Confirmatory Clinical Trial via Deep Learning.
    Zhan T; Hartford A; Kang J; Offen W
    Stat Biopharm Res; 2022; 14(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 35401935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symmetric graphs for equally weighted tests, with application to the Hochberg procedure.
    Xi D; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(27):5268-5282. PubMed ID: 31657025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods to adjust for multiple comparisons in the analysis and sample size calculation of randomised controlled trials with multiple primary outcomes.
    Vickerstaff V; Omar RZ; Ambler G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):129. PubMed ID: 31226934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or parametric tests.
    Bretz F; Posch M; Glimm E; Klinglmueller F; Maurer W; Rohmeyer K
    Biom J; 2011 Nov; 53(6):894-913. PubMed ID: 21837623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.
    Bretz F; Maurer W; Brannath W; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):586-604. PubMed ID: 19051220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graphical approaches for the control of generalized error rates.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(23):3135-3155. PubMed ID: 32557848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graphical approaches using a Bonferroni mixture of weighted Simes tests.
    Lu K
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(22):4041-55. PubMed ID: 27226068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A graphical weighted power improving multiplicity correction approach for SNP selections.
    Saunders G; Fu G; Stevens JR
    Curr Genomics; 2014 Oct; 15(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 25435800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A note on testing families of hypotheses using graphical procedures.
    Maurer W; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5340-6. PubMed ID: 25043831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests.
    Strassburger K; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4914-27. PubMed ID: 18618415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the power of some binomial modifications of the Bonferroni multiple test.
    Teriokhin AT; de Meeûs T; Guégan JF
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2007; 68(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 18038646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative confidence regions for bonferroni-based closed-testing procedures that are not alpha-exhaustive.
    Guilbaud O
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):721-35. PubMed ID: 19655313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests.
    Burman CF; Sonesson C; Guilbaud O
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):739-61. PubMed ID: 19142850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advances in p-Value Based Multiple Test Procedures.
    Tamhane AC; Gou J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 29072552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A parametric multiple test procedure to adaptive group-sequential trials allowing for mid-term modifications.
    Jin M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Mar; 90():105955. PubMed ID: 32028024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size determination with familywise control of both type I and type II errors in clinical trials.
    Wang B; Ting N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(5):951-65. PubMed ID: 26881972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.