These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38074554)
61. Impact of a Heutagogical, Multimedia-Based Teaching Concept to Promote Self-Determined, Cooperative Student Learning in Clinical Radiology. Teichgräber U; Ingwersen M; Mentzel HJ; Aschenbach R; Neumann R; Franiel T; Herzog AB; Böttcher J; Pfeil A; Mensel B; Kühnel C; Freesmeyer M; Fischer MR; Zottmann J Rofo; 2021 Jun; 193(6):701-711. PubMed ID: 33327029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The effects of passive and active learning on student preference and performance in an undergraduate basic science course. Minhas PS; Ghosh A; Swanzy L Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(4):200-7. PubMed ID: 22434661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Effects of Recorded versus Live Teleconference Didactic Lectures on Medical Student Performance in the Surgery Clerkship. Huerta CT; Saberi RA; Thorson CM; Hui VW; Rodgers SE; Sands LR J Surg Educ; 2023 Feb; 80(2):228-234. PubMed ID: 36241483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Assessing the Merits and Effectiveness of Peer Teaching in Small Groups through the Employment of Different Learning Media. Shrivastava SR; Shrivastava PS Avicenna J Med; 2023 Oct; 13(4):215-222. PubMed ID: 38144916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. A prospective randomized trial of content expertise versus process expertise in small group teaching. Peets AD; Cooke L; Wright B; Coderre S; McLaughlin K BMC Med Educ; 2010 Oct; 10():70. PubMed ID: 20946674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Comparing the impacts of reciprocal peer teaching with faculty teaching: A single-centre experience from KSA. AlShareef SM J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2020 Aug; 15(4):272-277. PubMed ID: 32982630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Are students learning what faculty are intending to teach? Hagen SS; Shaikh MJ; Rosenbaum ME; Ephgrave K J Surg Res; 2008 Jun; 147(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 18440027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Benè KL; Bergus G Fam Med; 2014; 46(10):783-7. PubMed ID: 25646829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Relationship of students' perceptions of faculty to scholastic achievement: are popular instructors better educators? Fenderson BA; Damjanov I; Robeson MR; Rubin E Hum Pathol; 1997 May; 28(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 9158698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Integrated clinical case discussions - a fully student-organized peer-teaching program on internal medicine. Reifenrath J; Seiferth N; Wilhelm T; Holzmann-Littig C; Phillip V; Wijnen-Meijer M BMC Med Educ; 2022 Dec; 22(1):828. PubMed ID: 36457088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Assessment of lecture strategy with different teaching AIDS. Kumar M; Saxena I; Kumar J; Kumar G; Kapoor S J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Jan; 9(1):CC01-5. PubMed ID: 25737979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Exploring the Value of Hosting a Grassroots Neuroscience Workshop That Facilitates Near-Peer Engagement Between Medical Students and High School Students (Local Brain Bee Participants) in a Developing Country in the Caribbean. Walcott-Bedeau G; Navarro Garcia E; Al-Rubaye H; Stergiou A; Mandalaneni K Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36222. PubMed ID: 37065326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Interactive Lecture in the Dissection Hall: Transforming Passive Lecture into a Dynamic Learning Experience. Chimmalgi M Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30118568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Video-based, student tutor- versus faculty staff-led ultrasound course for medical students - a prospective randomized study. Eimer C; Duschek M; Jung AE; Zick G; Caliebe A; Lindner M; Weiler N; Elke G BMC Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 20(1):512. PubMed ID: 33327947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Instructor factors associated with medical students' lecture evaluation: a longitudinal analysis. Rhie J; Chae YM; Park SG; Kim JH; Kim HJ Korean J Med Educ; 2023 Jun; 35(2):165-174. PubMed ID: 37291845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge. Brannagan KB; Dellinger A; Thomas J; Mitchell D; Lewis-Trabeaux S; Dupre S Nurse Educ Today; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1440-7. PubMed ID: 23260616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Peer assisted learning among Sri Lankan medical undergraduates: a cross sectional study. de Silva NL; Parththipan B; Rodrigo C; Constantine G; Fernando SD; Rajapakse S BMC Res Notes; 2017 Nov; 10(1):595. PubMed ID: 29137662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Student perception of peer teaching and learning in pathology: A qualitative analysis of modified seminars, fishbowls, and interactive classroom activities. Grover S; Sood N; Chaudhary A Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2018; 61(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 30303144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom. Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A comparison of conventional lecture and team-based learning methods in terms of student learning and teaching satisfaction. Jafari Z Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2014; 28():5. PubMed ID: 25250250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]