167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38074778)
1. A Deep Learning Decision Support Tool to Improve Risk Stratification and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS 4 Mammograms.
Ezeana CF; He T; Patel TA; Kaklamani V; Elmi M; Brigmon E; Otto PM; Kist KA; Speck H; Wang L; Ensor J; Shih YT; Kim B; Pan IW; Cohen AL; Kelley K; Spak D; Yang WT; Chang JC; Wong STC
Radiol Artif Intell; 2023 Nov; 5(6):e220259. PubMed ID: 38074778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Deep Learning-Based Decision Support Tool for Precision Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer.
He T; Puppala M; Ezeana CF; Huang YS; Chou PH; Yu X; Chen S; Wang L; Yin Z; Danforth RL; Ensor J; Chang J; Patel T; Wong STC
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 May; 3():1-12. PubMed ID: 31141423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database.
Berg WA; Berg JM; Sickles EA; Burnside ES; Zuley ML; Rosenberg RD; Lee CS
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32427557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Improved Nomogram to Reduce False-Positive Biopsy Rates of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Ultrasonography Category 4A Lesions.
Hai L; Feng Y; Zhao J; Tang Q; Wang X; Cao X; Xiao C
Cancer Control; 2022; 29():10732748221122703. PubMed ID: 37735939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies for mammographic BI-RADS 4 lesions through a deep transfer learning method.
Meng M; Li H; Zhang M; He G; Wang L; Shen D
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):82. PubMed ID: 37312026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiomics Based on Digital Mammography Helps to Identify Mammographic Masses Suspicious for Cancer.
Wang G; Shi D; Guo Q; Zhang H; Wang S; Ren K
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():843436. PubMed ID: 35433437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative efficacy study of diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in BI-RADS 4 breast cancer diagnosis.
Ezeana CF; Puppala M; Wang L; Chang JC; Wong STC
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Aug; 153():110361. PubMed ID: 35617870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Kaiser score reliably excludes malignancy in benign contrast-enhancing lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast MRI high-risk screening exams.
Milos RI; Pipan F; Kalovidouri A; Clauser P; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6052-6061. PubMed ID: 32504098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A bimodal nomogram as an adjunct tool to reduce unnecessary breast biopsy following discordant ultrasonic and mammographic BI-RADS assessment.
Xu Z; Lin Y; Huo J; Gao Y; Lu J; Liang Y; Li L; Jiang Z; Du L; Lang T; Wen G; Li Y
Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2608-2618. PubMed ID: 37840099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS categorization in an Asian population.
Tan YY; Wee SB; Tan MP; Chong BK
Asian J Surg; 2004 Jul; 27(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 15564158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.
Orel SG; Kay N; Reynolds C; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 10352614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?
Gu Y; Tian J; Ran H; Ren W; Chang C; Yuan J; Kang C; Deng Y; Wang H; Luo B; Guo S; Zhou Q; Xue E; Zhan W; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang C; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu J; Chen W; Zhang Y; Li J; Wang H; Jiang Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jun; 22(4):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 34815174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. External Evaluation of a Mammography-based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Breast Cancer in an Ethnically Diverse Population.
Omoleye OJ; Woodard AE; Howard FM; Zhao F; Yoshimatsu TF; Zheng Y; Pearson AT; Levental M; Aribisala BS; Kulkarni K; Karczmar GS; Olopade OI; Abe H; Huo D
Radiol Artif Intell; 2023 Nov; 5(6):e220299. PubMed ID: 38074785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets.
Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
