These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38075230)

  • 1. Development and visualization of a risk prediction model for metabolic syndrome: a longitudinal cohort study based on health check-up data in China.
    Liu W; Tang X; Cui T; Zhao H; Song G
    Front Nutr; 2023; 10():1286654. PubMed ID: 38075230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which model is better in predicting the survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?: Comparison of the random survival forest based on machine learning algorithms to Cox regression: analyses based on SEER database.
    Sun H; Wu S; Li S; Jiang X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(10):e33144. PubMed ID: 36897699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of a prediction model based on random survival forest for the prognosis of non- Hodgkin lymphoma: A prospective cohort study in China.
    Li X; Yang Z; Li J; Wang G; Sun A; Wang Y; Zhang W; Liu Y; Lei H
    Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(12):e32788. PubMed ID: 39022101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized postoperative chemotherapy: A real-world study of distal cholangiocarcinoma.
    Wang D; Pan B; Huang JC; Chen Q; Cui SP; Lang R; Lyu SC
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1106029. PubMed ID: 37007095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognosis prediction of extremity and trunk wall soft-tissue sarcomas treated with surgical resection with radiomic analysis based on random survival forest.
    Yang Y; Ma X; Wang Y; Ding X
    Updates Surg; 2022 Feb; 74(1):355-365. PubMed ID: 34003477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mortality prediction and influencing factors for intensive care unit patients with acute tubular necrosis: random survival forest and cox regression analysis.
    Zeng J; Zhang M; Du J; Han J; Song Q; Duan T; Yang J; Wu Y
    Front Pharmacol; 2024; 15():1361923. PubMed ID: 38846097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors associated with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year follow-up comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional-hazards model.
    Farhadian M; Dehdar Karsidani S; Mozayanimonfared A; Mahjub H
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Jan; 21(1):38. PubMed ID: 33461487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.
    Baralou V; Kalpourtzi N; Touloumi G
    Biom J; 2023 Aug; 65(6):e2100380. PubMed ID: 36169048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prediction model based on random survival forest analysis of the overall survival of elderly female papillary thyroid carcinoma patients: a SEER-based study.
    Lun Y; Yuan H; Ma P; Chen J; Lu P; Wang W; Liang R; Zhang J; Gao W; Ding X; Li S; Wang Z; Guo J; Lu L
    Endocrine; 2024 Sep; 85(3):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 38558373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Xiao J; Mo M; Wang Z; Zhou C; Shen J; Yuan J; He Y; Zheng Y
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Feb; 10(2):e33440. PubMed ID: 35179504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study on the prediction model of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the rural Xinjiang population based on survival analysis.
    Qian X; Keerman M; Zhang X; Guo H; He J; Maimaitijiang R; Wang X; Ma J; Li Y; Ma R; Guo S
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):1041. PubMed ID: 37264356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of random survival forest and Cox regression for prediction of mortality in patients with hemorrhagic stroke.
    Wang Y; Deng Y; Tan Y; Zhou M; Jiang Y; Liu B
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Oct; 23(1):215. PubMed ID: 37833724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bi-Centric Independent Validation of Outcome Prediction after Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancer.
    Fabritius MP; Seidensticker M; Rueckel J; Heinze C; Pech M; Paprottka KJ; Paprottka PM; Topalis J; Bender A; Ricke J; Mittermeier A; Ingrisch M
    J Clin Med; 2021 Aug; 10(16):. PubMed ID: 34441964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of lung papillary adenocarcinoma-specific survival using ensemble machine learning models.
    Xia K; Chen D; Jin S; Yi X; Luo L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14827. PubMed ID: 37684259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual mortality risk predictive system of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure based on a random survival forest model.
    Zhang ZQ; He G; Luo ZW; Cheng CC; Wang P; Li J; Zhu MG; Ming L; He TS; Ouyang YL; Huang YY; Wu XL; Ye YN
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2021 Jun; 134(14):1701-1708. PubMed ID: 34133353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Yang X; Qiu H; Wang L; Wang X
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e44417. PubMed ID: 37883174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of forest methods for time-to-event data: variable selection and predictive performance.
    Liu Y; Zhou S; Wei H; An S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):193. PubMed ID: 34563138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Construction of a Risk Prediction Model for Lung Cancer Based on Lifestyle Behaviors in the UK Biobank Large-Scale Population Cohort].
    Chen R; Wang J; Wang S; Tang S; Suo C
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Sep; 54(5):892-898. PubMed ID: 37866943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict imminent new vertebral fractures after vertebral augmentation.
    Jiang Y; Cai J; Zeng Y; Ye H; Yang T; Liu Z; Liu Q
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jun; 24(1):472. PubMed ID: 37296426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel head and neck cancer survival analysis approach: random survival forests versus Cox proportional hazards regression.
    Datema FR; Moya A; Krause P; Bäck T; Willmes L; Langeveld T; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Blom HM
    Head Neck; 2012 Jan; 34(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 21322080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.