162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38075295)
1. Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes of Epidermal Staples vs Sutures in Deep Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.
Ockerman KM; Han SH; Trieu NS; Mardourian M; Neal D; Kanchwala S; Spiguel L; Furnas HJ; Sorice-Virk S
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2023; 5():ojad098. PubMed ID: 38075295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aesthetic Comparison of Abdominal Donor Site Scar Between Absorbable Dermal Staple and Subcutaneous Suture after Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled, Double-Blinded Study.
Chung JH; Kim HK; Lee YH; Lee HC; You HJ; Kim DW
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Feb; 45(1):143-150. PubMed ID: 33057829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin closure after laparotomy with staples or sutures: a study of the mature scar.
Simcock JW; Armitage J; Dixon L; MacFarlane K; Robertson GM; Frizelle FA
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Sep; 84(9):656-9. PubMed ID: 23809005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods.
Piñeros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Drake DB; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16566742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aesthetic Comparison between Subcuticular Suture and Staple Closure of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Incision Scars: A Prospective Controlled Single-blinded Trial.
Rajamand S; Kakos D; Tong D; Garmo L; Soo TM
Cureus; 2019 Feb; 11(2):e3996. PubMed ID: 30989005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Donor-site closure using absorbable dermal staple for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: its efficacy and cosmetic outcomes.
Han HH; Kim SY; Lee YJ; Moon SH; Oh DY
Springerplus; 2016; 5():363. PubMed ID: 27066373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Placement of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Mammaplasty and Abdominoplasty: A 12-Month Prospective Study of 60 Patients.
Bron T; Zakine G
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 26530478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
Goto S; Sakamoto T; Ganeko R; Hida K; Furukawa TA; Sakai Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy.
Ku D; Koo DH; Bae DS
J Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 256():413-421. PubMed ID: 32791393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The absorbable dermal staple device: a faster, more cost-effective method for incisional closure.
Cross KJ; Teo EH; Wong SL; Lambe JS; Rohde CH; Grant RT; Ascherman JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Jul; 124(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 19568054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap donor-site closure with cannula-assisted, limited undermining, and progressive high-tension sutures versus standard abdominoplasty: complications, sensitivity, and cosmetic outcomes.
Visconti G; Tomaselli F; Monda A; Barone-Adesi L; Salgarello M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 25285682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Influence of Closing the Abdominal Donor-Site Superficial Fascial System in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.
Johnson AC; King BBT; Colakoglu S; Yang JH; Chong TW; Mathes DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):357e-364e. PubMed ID: 34432680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Randomized Study Comparing Skin Staples with Subcuticular Sutures for Wound Closure at Caesarean Section in Black-Skinned Women.
Abdus-Salam RA; Bello FA; Olayemi O
Int Sch Res Notices; 2014; 2014():807937. PubMed ID: 27437457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis.
Smith TO; Sexton D; Mann C; Donell S
BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1199. PubMed ID: 20234041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of wound closure techniques in median sternotomy scars in children: subcuticular suture versus Steri-Strip™ S.
van de Kar AL; Koolbergen DR; van Avendonk JPH; van der Horst CMAM
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2019 Jun; 53(3):161-166. PubMed ID: 30688134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified aesthetic abdominoplasty approach in perforator free-flap breast reconstruction: Impact of drain free donor site on patient outcomes.
Mohan AT; Rammos CK; Gaba P; Schupbach J; Goede WJ; Ballman K; Batdorf N; Cheng A; Saint-Cyr M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jun; 68(6):800-9. PubMed ID: 25843908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
