198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38078749)
21. Metagenomic evidence for a polymicrobial signature of sepsis.
Tan CCS; Acman M; van Dorp L; Balloux F
Microb Genom; 2021 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 34477543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Big Data, Evolution, and Metagenomes: Predicting Disease from Gut Microbiota Codon Usage Profiles.
Fabijanić M; Vlahoviček K
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1415():509-31. PubMed ID: 27115650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bioenergetic mapping of 'healthy microbiomes' via compound processing potential imprinted in gut and soil metagenomes.
Liddicoat C; Edwards RA; Roach M; Robinson JM; Wallace KJ; Barnes AD; Brame J; Heintz-Buschart A; Cavagnaro TR; Dinsdale EA; Doane MP; Eisenhauer N; Mitchell G; Rai B; Ramesh SA; Breed MF
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Aug; 940():173543. PubMed ID: 38821286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Metagenome-scale community metabolic modelling for understanding the role of gut microbiota in human health.
Beura S; Kundu P; Das AK; Ghosh A
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Oct; 149():105997. PubMed ID: 36055158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretable and accurate prediction models for metagenomics data.
Prifti E; Chevaleyre Y; Hanczar B; Belda E; Danchin A; Clément K; Zucker JD
Gigascience; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32150601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microbiome-based disease prediction with multimodal variational information bottlenecks.
Grazioli F; Siarheyeu R; Alqassem I; Henschel A; Pileggi G; Meiser A
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Apr; 18(4):e1010050. PubMed ID: 35404958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Practical considerations for sampling and data analysis in contemporary metagenomics-based environmental studies.
Staley C; Sadowsky MJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():14-18. PubMed ID: 30287354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Metagenomics: Probing pollutant fate in natural and engineered ecosystems.
Bouhajja E; Agathos SN; George IF
Biotechnol Adv; 2016 Dec; 34(8):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 27825829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Resolution of habitat-associated ecogenomic signatures in bacteriophage genomes and application to microbial source tracking.
Ogilvie LA; Nzakizwanayo J; Guppy FM; Dedi C; Diston D; Taylor H; Ebdon J; Jones BV
ISME J; 2018 Apr; 12(4):942-958. PubMed ID: 29259289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. MetaPheno: A critical evaluation of deep learning and machine learning in metagenome-based disease prediction.
LaPierre N; Ju CJ; Zhou G; Wang W
Methods; 2019 Aug; 166():74-82. PubMed ID: 30885720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Machine learning algorithm to characterize antimicrobial resistance associated with the International Space Station surface microbiome.
Madrigal P; Singh NK; Wood JM; Gaudioso E; Hernández-Del-Olmo F; Mason CE; Venkateswaran K; Beheshti A
Microbiome; 2022 Aug; 10(1):134. PubMed ID: 35999570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Metagenomic studies of the Red Sea.
Behzad H; Ibarra MA; Mineta K; Gojobori T
Gene; 2016 Feb; 576(2 Pt 1):717-23. PubMed ID: 26526132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. AMAnD: an automated metagenome anomaly detection methodology utilizing DeepSVDD neural networks.
Price C; Russell JA
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1181911. PubMed ID: 37497030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Application of machine learning techniques for creating urban microbial fingerprints.
Ryan FJ
Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):13. PubMed ID: 31420049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Phylogeny-corrected identification of microbial gene families relevant to human gut colonization.
Bradley PH; Nayfach S; Pollard KS
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Aug; 14(8):e1006242. PubMed ID: 30091981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gene-based microbiome representation enhances host phenotype classification.
Deschênes T; Tohoundjona FWE; Plante PL; Di Marzo V; Raymond F
mSystems; 2023 Aug; 8(4):e0053123. PubMed ID: 37404032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Whokaryote: distinguishing eukaryotic and prokaryotic contigs in metagenomes based on gene structure.
Pronk LJU; Medema MH
Microb Genom; 2022 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 35503723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multimodal deep learning applied to classify healthy and disease states of human microbiome.
Lee SJ; Rho M
Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):824. PubMed ID: 35039534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ecogenomic perspectives on domains of unknown function: correlation-based exploration of marine metagenomes.
Buttigieg PL; Hankeln W; Kostadinov I; Kottmann R; Yilmaz P; Duhaime MB; Glöckner FO
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e50869. PubMed ID: 23516388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
