160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38078978)
1. Regional variations and deprivation are linked to poorer access to laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery: a national study in England.
Morton AJ; Simpson A; Humes DJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 28(1):9. PubMed ID: 38078978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.
Mayo JS; Brazer ML; Bogenberger KJ; Tavares KB; Conrad RJ; Lustik MB; Gillern SM; Park CW; Richards CR
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2805-2816. PubMed ID: 32591939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the Regional Uptake of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: a Report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program.
Unruh KR; Bastawrous AL; Bernier GV; Flum DR; Kumar AS; Moonka R; Thirlby RC; Simianu VV
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2387-2397. PubMed ID: 33206328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in the Use of Laparoscopy and Robotics for Colorectal Cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens J; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jul; 29(7):926-933. PubMed ID: 31094645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Colorectal Operations.
Hajirawala LN; Leonardi C; Orangio GR; Davis KG; Barton JS
Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):2129-2131. PubMed ID: 34318696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.
Warps AK; Saraste D; Westerterp M; Detering R; Sjövall A; Martling A; Dekker JWT; Tollenaar RAEM; Matthiessen P; Tanis PJ;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5986-6001. PubMed ID: 35258664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015.
Xia L; Talwar R; Taylor BL; Shin MH; Berger IB; Sperling CD; Chelluri RR; Zambrano IA; Raman JD; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):182.e17-182.e27. PubMed ID: 30630732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hayden DM; Korous KM; Brooks E; Tuuhetaufa F; King-Mullins EM; Martin AM; Grimes C; Rogers CR
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3306-3320. PubMed ID: 36520224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is robotic utilization associated with increased minimally invasive colorectal surgery rates? Surgeon-level evidence.
Justiniano CF; Becerra AZ; Loria A; Xu Z; Aquina CT; Temple LK; Fleming FJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5618-5626. PubMed ID: 35024928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.
Emmen AMLH; Görgec B; Zwart MJW; Daams F; Erdmann J; Festen S; Gouma DJ; van Gulik TM; van Hilst J; Kazemier G; Lof S; Sussenbach SI; Tanis PJ; Zonderhuis BM; Busch OR; Swijnenburg RJ; Besselink MG;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2659-2672. PubMed ID: 36401105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center.
Selby LV; DeMatteo RP; Tholey RM; Jarnagin WR; Garcia-Aguilar J; Strombom PD; Allen PJ; Kingham TP; Weiser MR; Brennan MF; Strong VE
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 28299807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of robotic surgery on a tertiary care colorectal surgery program, an assessment of costs and short term outcomes: A Canadian perspective.
Patel SV; Wiseman V; Zhang L; MacDonald PH; Merchant SM; Barnett KW; Caycedo-Marulanda A
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):6084-6094. PubMed ID: 35212820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
