156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38078978)
21. Insurance Disparities in Access to Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.
Childers CP; Uppal A; Tillman M; Chang GJ; Tran Cao HS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):3560-3568. PubMed ID: 36943527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterization of the robotic surgery experience in minimally invasive surgery fellowships from 2010 to 2021.
Haywood N; Scott J; Zhang A; Hallowell P; Schirmer B
Surg Endosc; 2023 Dec; 37(12):9393-9398. PubMed ID: 37658200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer.
Argenta PA; Mattson J; Rivard CL; Luther E; Schefter A; Vogel RI
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 May; 165(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35314086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.
Altieri MS; Yang J; Telem DA; Zhu J; Halbert C; Talamini M; Pryor AD
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):925-33. PubMed ID: 26139489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do specific operative approaches and insurance status impact timely access to colorectal cancer care?
Lo BD; Zhang GQ; Stem M; Sahyoun R; Efron JE; Safar B; Atallah C
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3774-3786. PubMed ID: 32813058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Regional and National Database Comparison of Colorectal Outcomes.
Batool F; Collins SD; Albright J; Ferraro J; Wu J; Krapohl GL; Campbell DA; Cleary RK
JSLS; 2018; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 30410300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.
Stewart CL; Ituarte PHG; Melstrom KA; Warner SG; Melstrom LG; Lai LL; Fong Y; Woo Y
Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2591-2601. PubMed ID: 30357525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.
Zhu XL; Yan PJ; Yao L; Liu R; Wu DW; Du BB; Yang KH; Guo TK; Yang XF
Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 30191755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: a cohort study examining clinical outcomes and cost.
Wilkie B; Summers Z; Hiscock R; Wickramasinghe N; Warrier S; Smart P
Aust Health Rev; 2019 Oct; 43(5):526-530. PubMed ID: 30922441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic tumors.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):398-409. PubMed ID: 27412124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis.
de'Angelis N; Abdalla S; Bianchi G; Memeo R; Charpy C; Petrucciani N; Sobhani I; Brunetti F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29851362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgical outcomes and cost analysis of a multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery caseload in the Australian public health system.
Steffens D; McBride KE; Hirst N; Solomon MJ; Anderson T; Thanigasalam R; Leslie S; Karunaratne S; Bannon PG
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2237-2245. PubMed ID: 37289337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic, and open approaches to pheochromocytoma.
Fang AM; Rosen J; Saidian A; Bae S; Tanno FY; Chambo JL; Bloom J; Gordetsky J; Srougi V; Phillips J; Rais-Bahrami S
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):849-854. PubMed ID: 32112185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pelvic Exenteration in Primary Colorectal Cancer.
Kumar NA; Sasi SP; Shinde RS; Verma K; Sugoor P; Desouza A; Engineer R; Saklani A
JSLS; 2020; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 32714002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of Hospital Volume on Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer.
Dougherty K; Zhang Z; Montenegro G; Hinyard L; Xu E; Hsueh E; Luu C
Am Surg; 2023 Nov; 89(11):4569-4577. PubMed ID: 35999671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
