These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts. al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Dual-arch impressions as a diagnostic aid--a case report. Mizrahi B J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Jan; 51(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9461891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of factors affecting the accuracy of impressions using quantitative surface analysis. Lee IK; DeLong R; Pintado MR; Malik R Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):246-52. PubMed ID: 8710707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Adhesion and retention of various alginate impression compounds to the tray]. Schwindling R; Schüler P ZWR; 1973 Feb; 82(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 4569432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Indirect impression technic with a multi-layer hydrocolloid material]. Node H Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1979 Mar; 46(1):105. PubMed ID: 381548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. [Manipulation of alginates in impression taking]. Zavala F ADM; 1979; 36(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 382766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Note on alginate impression materials. Bliss HD; Saggs VR N Z Dent J; 1967 Oct; 63(294):282-4. PubMed ID: 4863779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Disinfection of impressions. Methods and effects on accuracy. Poulos JG; Antonoff LR N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(6):34-6. PubMed ID: 9256603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An experimental investigation for analyzing the influence of impression precedures in clinical technique. Matsumoto M Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1970 Dec; 17(4):345-56. PubMed ID: 4925148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [Sources of error in various impression technics in the dental practice]. Plischka G; Sorger F Osterr Z Stomatol; 1970; 67(6):207-14. PubMed ID: 4912793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of lingual sulcus depth obtained with three impression materials. Jooste CH; Bradshaw D; Jooste N J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1987 May; 42(5):241-4. PubMed ID: 3313817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [For the 2d impression elastomers are better]. Maj F; Tassarotti B; Manglavite R; Chiari A Attual Dent; 1986 Jun; 2(22):58-61. PubMed ID: 3533112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Absorption of fluoride following inhalation and ingestion of alginate impression materials. Hattab F Pharmacol Ther Dent; 1981; 6(3-4):79-86. PubMed ID: 6953453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [The use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the results obtained on various conditions of processing. 4. Comparison of the capsule mixing technic for alginate impression material and model plaster and mechanical processing]. Welker D Stomatol DDR; 1974 Jul; 24(7):452-7. PubMed ID: 4526357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]