These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38081463)

  • 1. Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.
    Dat KO; Cher D; Polly DW
    Spine J; 2024 May; 24(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 38081463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.
    Polly DW; Swofford J; Whang PG; Frank CJ; Glaser JA; Limoni RP; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Sembrano JN;
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():28. PubMed ID: 27652199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.
    Dengler JD; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Gaetani P; van Eeckhoven E; Cher D; Sturesson B
    Pain Physician; 2017 Sep; 20(6):537-550. PubMed ID: 28934785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.
    Sturesson B; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Dengler J
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 27179664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of Outcome in Conservative and Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Pain Originating From the Sacroiliac Joint: A Pooled Analysis.
    Dengler J; Duhon B; Whang P; Frank C; Glaser J; Sturesson B; Garfin S; Cher D; Rendahl A; Polly D;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Nov; 42(21):1664-1673. PubMed ID: 28350586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.
    Polly DW; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Whang PG; Frank CJ; Harvey CF; Lockstadt H; Glaser JA; Limoni RP; Sembrano JN;
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Nov; 77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. PubMed ID: 26291338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term prospective outcomes after minimally invasive trans-iliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.
    Darr E; Meyer SC; Whang PG; Kovalsky D; Frank C; Lockstadt H; Limoni R; Redmond A; Ploska P; Oh MY; Cher D; Chowdhary A
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2018; 11():113-121. PubMed ID: 29674852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.
    Rainov NG; Schneiderhan R; Heidecke V
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Apr; 28(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 30564865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.
    Vanaclocha V; Herrera JM; Sáiz-Sapena N; Rivera-Paz M; Verdú-López F
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Jan; 82(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 28431026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review.
    Anton G; Alsalahi A; Yoon EJ; Turnbull J; Dragonette J; Richards B; Tong D; Soo TM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jul; 55(1):E2. PubMed ID: 37392775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive lateral transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using 3D-printed triangular titanium implants.
    Patel V; Kovalsky D; Meyer SC; Chowdhary A; Lockstadt H; Techy F; Billys J; Limoni R; Yuan PS; Kranenburg A; Cher D; Tender G
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2019; 12():203-214. PubMed ID: 31239791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four-year outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion with triangular titanium implants.
    Darr E; Cher D
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2018; 11():287-289. PubMed ID: 30214322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium versus Cylindrical Threaded Implants: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.
    Claus CF; Lytle E; Kaufmann A; Tong D; Bahoura M; Garmo L; Richards B; Soo TM; Houseman C
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e745-e750. PubMed ID: 31605853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ghaddaf AA; Alsharef JF; Alsharef NK; Alsaegh MH; Alshaban RM; Almutairi AO; Abualola AH; Alshehri MS
    Can J Surg; 2024; 67(1):E16-E26. PubMed ID: 38278549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Computed Tomography Review After Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint With Aggressive Joint Decortication and Joint Compression.
    Cross WW; Tomov MN; Hung MY; Muir JM
    Orthopedics; 2024; 47(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 37672779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Duhon BS; Bitan F; Lockstadt H; Kovalsky D; Cher D; Hillen T;
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():13. PubMed ID: 27162715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective?
    Ledonio CG; Polly DW; Swiontkowski MF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1831-8. PubMed ID: 24519569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint.
    Kasapovic A; Schwetje D; Ali T; Jaenisch M; Gathen M; Bornemann R; Abdallah H; Vieweg U
    Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(5):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 35342065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D-Printed Triangular Titanium Implants.
    Patel V; Kovalsky D; Meyer SC; Chowdhary A; Lockstadt H; Techy F; Langel C; Limoni R; Yuan PS; Kranenburg A; Cher D; Tender G; Hillen TJ
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2020; 13():173-182. PubMed ID: 32607011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.