These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Texas court grants woman with non-viable pregnancy right to abortion. Tanne JH BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2908. PubMed ID: 38084504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3. Holman EJ JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US Supreme Court ends constitutional right to abortion. Tanne JH BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1575. PubMed ID: 35760421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Internet Searches for Abortion Medications Following the Leaked Supreme Court of the United States Draft Ruling. Poliak A; Satybaldiyeva N; Strathdee SA; Leas EC; Rao R; Smith D; Ayers JW JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):1002-1004. PubMed ID: 35767270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access. Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 1. Holman EJ JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 4740289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. We're horrified by the rejection of Roe v Wade-but abortion is not a universal right in the UK. Graham S BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o1945. PubMed ID: 35977739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The fall of Roe Lewandowska M BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1608. PubMed ID: 35768122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions. Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Texas court hears challenge to state's strict abortion ban by women who say they were harmed. Tanne JH BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2863. PubMed ID: 38049174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The US Supreme Court is wrong to disregard evidence on the harm of banning abortion. Nature; 2022 May; 605(7909):193-194. PubMed ID: 35513454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The judgment of the Supreme Court American statement on abortion: an ″earthquake″ with unintended consequences]. Díez Fernández JA Cuad Bioet; 2022; 33(109):351-352. PubMed ID: 36493419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion Convictions Before Roe. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2021; 36(1):77-110. PubMed ID: 33939343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Historical Feature: A Long History of Abortion. McSpedon C Am J Nurs; 2022 Oct; 122(10):42-44. PubMed ID: 36136024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. US Supreme Court delays enforcement of strict Texas abortion law. McCarthy M BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6304. PubMed ID: 25354191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. People v. Frey. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1973 Mar; 294():257-9. PubMed ID: 12041231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]