145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38082642)
21. Control system design of a 3-DOF upper limbs rehabilitation robot.
Denève A; Moughamir S; Afilal L; Zaytoon J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Feb; 89(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 17881080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A scoping review of design requirements for a home-based upper limb rehabilitation robot for stroke.
Li L; Fu Q; Tyson S; Preston N; Weightman A
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2022 Sep; 29(6):449-463. PubMed ID: 34281494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study.
Taveggia G; Borboni A; Salvi L; Mulé C; Fogliaresi S; Villafañe JH; Casale R
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Dec; 52(6):767-773. PubMed ID: 27406879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation.
Rosati G; Gallina P; Masiero S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Dec; 15(4):560-9. PubMed ID: 18198714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robot-aided therapy on the upper limb of subacute and chronic stroke patients: a biomechanical approach.
Mazzoleni S; Filippi M; Carrozza MC; Posteraro F; Puzzolante L; Falchi E
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975422. PubMed ID: 22275623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Delconte C; Mazzone A; Grioni G; Castagna M; Bazzini G; Imarisio C; Maggioni G; Pistarini C
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impedance Control of a 2-DOF Spherical 5-Bar Exoskeleton for Physical Human-Robot Interaction During Rehabilitation and Assessment.
Wolbrecht E; Ketkar V; Perry JC
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute and chronic stroke patients using an innovative end-effector haptic device: A pilot study.
Mazzoleni S; Battini E; Crecchi R; Dario P; Posteraro F
NeuroRehabilitation; 2018; 42(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29400670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative Assessment of Motor Function for Patients with a Stroke by an End-Effector Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot.
Liu Y; Song Q; Li C; Guan X; Ji L
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5425741. PubMed ID: 32462001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Customized Trajectory Optimization and Compliant Tracking Control for Passive Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
Li L; Han J; Li X; Guo B; Wang X
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(15):. PubMed ID: 37571735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hybrid position and orientation tracking for a passive rehabilitation table-top robot.
Wojewoda KK; Culmer PR; Gallagher JF; Jackson AE; Levesley MC
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():702-707. PubMed ID: 28813902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Configuration-Dependent Optimal Impedance Control of an Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation Manipulandum.
Ghannadi B; Sharif Razavian R; McPhee J
Front Robot AI; 2018; 5():124. PubMed ID: 33501003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. sEMG-Based Gain-Tuned Compliance Control for the Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot during Passive Training.
Tian J; Wang H; Zheng S; Ning Y; Zhang X; Niu J; Vladareanu L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of training using an upper limb rehabilitation robot (HEXO-UR30A) in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Kim JA; Chun MH; Lee A; Ji Y; Jang H; Han C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(12):e33246. PubMed ID: 36961152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of a Planar Haptic Robot With Minimized Impedance.
Oh K; Rymer WZ; Plenzio I; Mussa-Ivaldi FA; Park S; Choi J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 May; 68(5):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 33206599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dynamic Modeling and Interactive Performance of PARM: A Parallel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Using Impedance Control for Patients after Stroke.
Guang H; Ji L; Shi Y; Misgeld BJE
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():8647591. PubMed ID: 29850004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Case studies in poststroke hemiplegic patients using SEMUL: a passive 2-DOF rehabilitation robot.
Koyanagi K; Kuwahara Y; Kamida T; Ozawa T; Mizukami R; Genda K; Mori A; Motoyoshi T; Masuta H; Oshima T
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4678-4681. PubMed ID: 28269316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving Stability in Upper Limb Rehabilitation Using Variable Stiffness.
Jujjavarapu SS; Esfahani ET
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():122-125. PubMed ID: 31945859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nonlinear time delay estimation based model reference adaptive impedance control for an upper-limb human-robot interaction.
Omrani J; Moghaddam MM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Mar; 236(3):385-398. PubMed ID: 34720012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
