These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38082723)

  • 1. Impaired Discrimination of Electrocutaneous Stimulation in the Paretic Hand of Stroke Survivors.
    Citterman AR; Stewart AE; Urban RJ; Trout MA; Maitre PP; Edgley SR; Richards LG; Iversen MM; George JA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 38082723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity Discriminability of Electrocutaneous and Intraneural Stimulation Pulse Frequency in Intact Individuals and Amputees.
    George JA; Brinton MR; Colgan PC; Colvin GK; Bensmaia SJ; Clark GA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3893-3896. PubMed ID: 33018851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory retraining improves light touch threshold of the paretic hand in chronic stroke survivors: a single-subject A-B design.
    Hejazi-Shirmard M; Taghizadeh G; Azad A; Lajevardi L; Rassafiani M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2020 Jun; 37(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 32162568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Daily repetitive sensory stimulation of the paretic hand for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits in patients with subacute stroke: RESET, a randomized, sham-controlled trial.
    Kattenstroth JC; Kalisch T; Sczesny-Kaiser M; Greulich W; Tegenthoff M; Dinse HR
    BMC Neurol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 29316895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of repetitive electrical stimulation to treat sensory loss in persons poststroke.
    Smith PS; Dinse HR; Kalisch T; Johnson M; Walker-Batson D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Dec; 90(12):2108-11. PubMed ID: 19969176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactile spatial resolution in unilateral brain lesions and its correlation with digital dexterity.
    Bleyenheuft Y; Thonnard JL
    J Rehabil Med; 2011 Feb; 43(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 21305242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke.
    Peurala SH; Pitkänen K; Sivenius J; Tarkka IM
    Clin Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 16(7):709-16. PubMed ID: 12428819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke.
    Wu CW; Seo HJ; Cohen LG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 87(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 16500168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed Muscle Activity in Stroke Survivors with Upper-Limb Hemiparesis.
    Lopez DR; Thomson CJ; Mino FR; Edgely SR; Maitre PP; Iversen MM; George JA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Activity-based electrical stimulation training in a stroke patient with minimal movement in the paretic upper extremity.
    Page SJ; Maslyn S; Hermann VH; Wu A; Dunning K; Levine PG
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009; 23(6):595-9. PubMed ID: 19095624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Restoration of Somatosensory Function by Pairing Vagus Nerve Stimulation with Tactile Rehabilitation.
    Darrow MJ; Mian TM; Torres M; Haider Z; Danaphongse T; Rennaker RL; Kilgard MP; Hays SA
    Ann Neurol; 2020 Feb; 87(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 31875975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remote vibrotactile noise improves light touch sensation in stroke survivors' fingertips via stochastic resonance.
    Enders LR; Hur P; Johnson MJ; Seo NJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 10():105. PubMed ID: 24112371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Case Studies in Neuroscience: Sensations elicited and discrimination ability from nerve cuff stimulation in an amputee over time.
    Ackerley R; Backlund Wasling H; Ortiz-Catalan M; Brånemark R; Wessberg J
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Jul; 120(1):291-295. PubMed ID: 29742031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced spatial discrimination in paretic hands.
    Doh WY; Kang SY; Sohn YH
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 119(5):1153-7. PubMed ID: 18313356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing touch sensibility with sensory electrical stimulation and sensory retraining.
    Villar Ortega E; Buetler KA; Aksöz EA; Marchal-Crespo L
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2024 May; 21(1):79. PubMed ID: 38750521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A pilot study of sensory feedback by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to improve manipulation deficit caused by severe sensory loss after stroke.
    Kita K; Otaka Y; Takeda K; Sakata S; Ushiba J; Kondo K; Liu M; Osu R
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 10():55. PubMed ID: 23764012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-paretic leg movements can facilitate cortical drive to the paretic leg in individuals post stroke with severe motor impairment: Implications for motor priming.
    Lim H; Madhavan S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 58(3):2853-2867. PubMed ID: 37354080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An initial exploration of the perceptual threshold test using electrical stimulation to measure arm sensation following stroke.
    Hedman LD; Sullivan JE
    Clin Rehabil; 2011 Nov; 25(11):1042-9. PubMed ID: 21427154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the contribution of the paretic hand to bimanual tasks change with grip strength capacity following stroke?
    Pollet AK; Patel P; Lodha N
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Apr; 168():108186. PubMed ID: 35189182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting.
    Carey LM; Matyas TA
    J Rehabil Med; 2011 Feb; 43(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 21305243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.