131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38082988)
1. The effect of deep brain structure modeling on transcranial direct current stimulation-induced electric fields: An in-silico study.
Song CB; Lim C; Lee J; Kim D; Seo H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38082988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation?
Antonenko D; Thielscher A; Saturnino GB; Aydin S; Ittermann B; Grittner U; Flöel A
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(5):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 30930209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. End-to-end semantic segmentation of personalized deep brain structures for non-invasive brain stimulation.
Rashed EA; Gomez-Tames J; Hirata A
Neural Netw; 2020 May; 125():233-244. PubMed ID: 32151914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach.
Arora Y; Chowdhury SR
J Med Syst; 2020 Jan; 44(2):48. PubMed ID: 31900599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of segmentation accuracy in structural MR head scans on electric field computation for TMS and tES.
Rashed EA; Gomez-Tames J; Hirata A
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):064002. PubMed ID: 33524957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of electric field modeling pipelines for transcranial direct current stimulation.
Bhalerao GV; Sreeraj VS; Bose A; Narayanaswamy JC; Venkatasubramanian G
Neurophysiol Clin; 2021 Aug; 51(4):303-318. PubMed ID: 34023189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiscale coupling of transcranial direct current stimulation to neuron electrodynamics: modeling the influence of the transcranial electric field on neuronal depolarization.
Dougherty ET; Turner JC; Vogel F
Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():360179. PubMed ID: 25404950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling.
Caulfield KA; Badran BW; DeVries WH; Summers PM; Kofmehl E; Li X; Borckardt JJ; Bikson M; George MS
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(4):961-969. PubMed ID: 32330607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significant group-level hotspots found in deep brain regions during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A computational analysis of electric fields.
Gomez-Tames J; Asai A; Hirata A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Mar; 131(3):755-765. PubMed ID: 31839398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response.
Albizu A; Fang R; Indahlastari A; O'Shea A; Stolte SE; See KB; Boutzoukas EM; Kraft JN; Nissim NR; Woods AJ
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(6):1753-1764. PubMed ID: 33049412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy.
Kasinadhuni AK; Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schär M; Mareci TH; Sadleir RJ
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):764-772. PubMed ID: 28457836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation-ROAST-a fully automated open-source pipeline.
Huang Y; Datta A; Bikson M; Parra LC
J Neural Eng; 2019 Jul; 16(5):056006. PubMed ID: 31071686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose-response in modulating brain function with transcranial direct current stimulation: From local to network levels.
Soleimani G; Kupliki R; Paulus M; Ekhtiari H
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Oct; 19(10):e1011572. PubMed ID: 37883583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Delayed Memory in Alzheimer's Disease Patients: A Pilot Study Using Computational Modeling to Optimize Electrode Position.
Rasmussen ID; Boayue NM; Mittner M; Bystad M; Grønli OK; Vangberg TR; Csifcsák G; Aslaksen PM
J Alzheimers Dis; 2021; 83(2):753-769. PubMed ID: 34366347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate and robust whole-head segmentation from magnetic resonance images for individualized head modeling.
Puonti O; Van Leemput K; Saturnino GB; Siebner HR; Madsen KH; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117044. PubMed ID: 32534963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shamo: A Tool for Electromagnetic Modeling, Simulation and Sensitivity Analysis of the Head.
Grignard M; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
Neuroinformatics; 2022 Jul; 20(3):811-824. PubMed ID: 35266105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value and limitations of intracranial recordings for validating electric field modeling for transcranial brain stimulation.
Puonti O; Saturnino GB; Madsen KH; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116431. PubMed ID: 31816421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current Density Imaging During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using DT-MRI and MREIT: Algorithm Development and Numerical Simulations.
Kwon OI; Sajib SZ; Sersa I; Oh TI; Jeong WC; Kim HJ; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jan; 63(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 26111387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the importance of using both T1-weighted and T2-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging scans to model electric fields induced by non-invasive brain stimulation in SimNIBS.
Van Hoornweder S; Meesen R; Caulfield KA
Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(3):641-644. PubMed ID: 35436593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
