303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38083894)
21. Comparative Analysis of Chemical Descriptors by Machine Learning Reveals Atomistic Insights into Solute-Lipid Interactions.
Lange JJ; Anelli A; Alsenz J; Kuentz M; O'Dwyer PJ; Saal W; Wyttenbach N; Griffin BT
Mol Pharm; 2024 Jul; 21(7):3343-3355. PubMed ID: 38780534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nano-QSPR Modelling of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials Properties.
Salahinejad M
Curr Top Med Chem; 2015; 15(18):1868-86. PubMed ID: 25961518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intravitreal clearance and volume of distribution of compounds in rabbits: In silico prediction and pharmacokinetic simulations for drug development.
del Amo EM; Vellonen KS; Kidron H; Urtti A
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2015 Sep; 95(Pt B):215-26. PubMed ID: 25603198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Building predictive ADMET models for early decisions in drug discovery.
Penzotti JE; Landrum GA; Putta S
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2004 Jan; 7(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 14982148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. QSPR in oral bioavailability: specificity or integrality?
Cabrera-Pérez MÁ; Pham-The H; Bermejo M; Álvarez IG; Álvarez MG; Garrigues TM
Mini Rev Med Chem; 2012 Jun; 12(6):534-50. PubMed ID: 22587767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction of drug intestinal absorption by new linear and non-linear QSPR.
Talevi A; Goodarzi M; Ortiz EV; Duchowicz PR; Bellera CL; Pesce G; Castro EA; Bruno-Blanch LE
Eur J Med Chem; 2011 Jan; 46(1):218-28. PubMed ID: 21112128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of Quantitative Structure Property Relationship Algorithms for Predicting Plasma Protein Binding in Humans.
Yun YE; Tornero-Velez R; Purucker ST; Chang DT; Edginton AN
Comput Toxicol; 2021 Feb; 17():100142. PubMed ID: 34017929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How Does the Methodology of 3D Structure Preparation Influence the Quality of pKa Prediction?
Geidl S; Svobodová Vařeková R; Bendová V; Petrusek L; Ionescu CM; Jurka Z; Abagyan R; Koča J
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1088-97. PubMed ID: 26010215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Utility of protein structures in overcoming ADMET-related issues of drug-like compounds.
Stoll F; Göller AH; Hillisch A
Drug Discov Today; 2011 Jun; 16(11-12):530-8. PubMed ID: 21554979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In silico prediction of ADMET properties: how far have we come?
Dearden JC
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2007 Oct; 3(5):635-9. PubMed ID: 17916052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 3. Modeling blood-brain barrier partitioning using simple molecular descriptors.
Hou TJ; Xu XJ
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(6):2137-52. PubMed ID: 14632466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Review of MARCH-INSIDE & complex networks prediction of drugs: ADMET, anti-parasite activity, metabolizing enzymes and cardiotoxicity proteome biomarkers.
González-Díaz H; Duardo-Sanchez A; Ubeira FM; Prado-Prado F; Pérez-Montoto LG; Concu R; Podda G; Shen B
Curr Drug Metab; 2010 May; 11(4):379-406. PubMed ID: 20446904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Development and validation of k-nearest-neighbor QSPR models of metabolic stability of drug candidates.
Shen M; Xiao Y; Golbraikh A; Gombar VK; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):3013-20. PubMed ID: 12825940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of remote liposome loading of drugs.
Cern A; Golbraikh A; Sedykh A; Tropsha A; Barenholz Y; Goldblum A
J Control Release; 2012 Jun; 160(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 22154932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Machine Learning for In Silico ADMET Prediction.
Jia L; Gao H
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2390():447-460. PubMed ID: 34731482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. AutoWeka: toward an automated data mining software for QSAR and QSPR studies.
Nantasenamat C; Worachartcheewan A; Jamsak S; Preeyanon L; Shoombuatong W; Simeon S; Mandi P; Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C; Prachayasittikul V
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1260():119-47. PubMed ID: 25502379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computer-aided Drug Design and Drug Pharmacokinetic Prediction: A Mini-review.
Tabeshpour J; Sahebkar A; Zirak MR; Zeinali M; Hashemzaei M; Rakhshani S; Rakhshani S
Curr Pharm Des; 2018; 24(26):3014-3019. PubMed ID: 30179125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Geometry optimization method versus predictive ability in QSPR modeling for ionic liquids.
Rybinska A; Sosnowska A; Barycki M; Puzyn T
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Feb; 30(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 26830600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Building a Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) Model.
Clark RD; Daga PR
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1939():139-159. PubMed ID: 30848460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Toward robust QSPR models: Synergistic utilization of robust regression and variable elimination.
Grohmann R; Schindler T
J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(6):847-60. PubMed ID: 17963234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
