BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38084924)

  • 1. Enhancer-promoter interactions can form independently of genomic distance and be functional across TAD boundaries.
    Balasubramanian D; Borges Pinto P; Grasso A; Vincent S; Tarayre H; Lajoignie D; Ghavi-Helm Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2024 Feb; 52(4):1702-1719. PubMed ID: 38084924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visualizing the Role of Boundary Elements in Enhancer-Promoter Communication.
    Yokoshi M; Segawa K; Fukaya T
    Mol Cell; 2020 Apr; 78(2):224-235.e5. PubMed ID: 32109364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invariant TAD Boundaries Constrain Cell-Type-Specific Looping Interactions between Promoters and Distal Elements around the CFTR Locus.
    Smith EM; Lajoie BR; Jain G; Dekker J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 98(1):185-201. PubMed ID: 26748519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 5C analysis of the Epidermal Differentiation Complex locus reveals distinct chromatin interaction networks between gene-rich and gene-poor TADs in skin epithelial cells.
    Poterlowicz K; Yarker JL; Malashchuk I; Lajoie BR; Mardaryev AN; Gdula MR; Sharov AA; Kohwi-Shigematsu T; Botchkarev VA; Fessing MY
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1006966. PubMed ID: 28863138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple CTCF sites cooperate with each other to maintain a TAD for enhancer-promoter interaction in the β-globin locus.
    Kang J; Kim YW; Park S; Kang Y; Kim A
    FASEB J; 2021 Aug; 35(8):e21768. PubMed ID: 34245617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Shh Topological Domain Facilitates the Action of Remote Enhancers by Reducing the Effects of Genomic Distances.
    Symmons O; Pan L; Remeseiro S; Aktas T; Klein F; Huber W; Spitz F
    Dev Cell; 2016 Dec; 39(5):529-543. PubMed ID: 27867070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Boundary stacking interactions enable cross-TAD enhancer-promoter communication during limb development.
    Hung TC; Kingsley DM; Boettiger AN
    Nat Genet; 2024 Feb; 56(2):306-314. PubMed ID: 38238628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonlinear control of transcription through enhancer-promoter interactions.
    Zuin J; Roth G; Zhan Y; Cramard J; Redolfi J; Piskadlo E; Mach P; Kryzhanovska M; Tihanyi G; Kohler H; Eder M; Leemans C; van Steensel B; Meister P; Smallwood S; Giorgetti L
    Nature; 2022 Apr; 604(7906):571-577. PubMed ID: 35418676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outward-oriented sites within clustered CTCF boundaries are key for intra-TAD chromatin interactions and gene regulation.
    Ge X; Huang H; Han K; Xu W; Wang Z; Wu Q
    Nat Commun; 2023 Dec; 14(1):8101. PubMed ID: 38062010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D genome evolution and reorganization in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.
    Torosin NS; Anand A; Golla TR; Cao W; Ellison CE
    PLoS Genet; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1009229. PubMed ID: 33284803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture.
    Cubeñas-Potts C; Rowley MJ; Lyu X; Li G; Lei EP; Corces VG
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):1714-1730. PubMed ID: 27899590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are TADs supercoiled?
    Racko D; Benedetti F; Dorier J; Stasiak A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jan; 47(2):521-532. PubMed ID: 30395328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of transposable elements and distal enhancers to evolution of human-specific features of interphase chromatin architecture in embryonic stem cells.
    Glinsky GV
    Chromosome Res; 2018 Mar; 26(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 29335803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active enhancers strengthen insulation by RNA-mediated CTCF binding at chromatin domain boundaries.
    Islam Z; Saravanan B; Walavalkar K; Farooq U; Singh AK; Radhakrishnan S; Thakur J; Pandit A; Henikoff S; Notani D
    Genome Res; 2023 Jan; 33(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 36650052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. InTAD: chromosome conformation guided analysis of enhancer target genes.
    Okonechnikov K; Erkek S; Korbel JO; Pfister SM; Chavez L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):60. PubMed ID: 30704404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context-dependent enhancer function revealed by targeted inter-TAD relocation.
    Bolt CC; Lopez-Delisle L; Hintermann A; Mascrez B; Rauseo A; Andrey G; Duboule D
    Nat Commun; 2022 Jun; 13(1):3488. PubMed ID: 35715427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic Runx1 chromatin boundaries affect gene expression in hematopoietic development.
    Owens DDG; Anselmi G; Oudelaar AM; Downes DJ; Cavallo A; Harman JR; Schwessinger R; Bucakci A; Greder L; de Ornellas S; Jeziorska D; Telenius J; Hughes JR; de Bruijn MFTR
    Nat Commun; 2022 Feb; 13(1):773. PubMed ID: 35140205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Large scale genomic reorganization of topological domains at the HoxD locus.
    Fabre PJ; Leleu M; Mormann BH; Lopez-Delisle L; Noordermeer D; Beccari L; Duboule D
    Genome Biol; 2017 Aug; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 28784160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of 3D genome organization, guided by cohesin and CTCF looping, on sex-biased chromatin interactions and gene expression in mouse liver.
    Matthews BJ; Waxman DJ
    Epigenetics Chromatin; 2020 Jul; 13(1):30. PubMed ID: 32680543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mode and Tempo of 3D Genome Evolution in Drosophila.
    Torosin NS; Golla TR; Lawlor MA; Cao W; Ellison CE
    Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Nov; 39(11):. PubMed ID: 36201625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.