126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38085164)
1. Comparison of massively parallel sequencing to capillary electrophoresis for short tandem repeat genotyping of trace DNA.
Dierig L; Kunz SN; Wiegand P
Electrophoresis; 2024 Mar; 45(5-6):451-462. PubMed ID: 38085164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA typing from skeletal remains: a comparison between capillary electrophoresis and massively parallel sequencing platforms.
Liu Z; Gao L; Zhang J; Fan Q; Chen M; Cheng F; Li W; Shi L; Zhang X; Zhang J; Zhang G; Yan J
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):2029-2035. PubMed ID: 32507908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Massively parallel sequencing of forensic STRs: Considerations of the DNA commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) on minimal nomenclature requirements.
Parson W; Ballard D; Budowle B; Butler JM; Gettings KB; Gill P; Gusmão L; Hares DR; Irwin JA; King JL; Knijff P; Morling N; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Neste CV; Willuweit S; Phillips C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():54-63. PubMed ID: 26844919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High sensitivity multiplex short tandem repeat loci analyses with massively parallel sequencing.
Zeng X; King JL; Stoljarova M; Warshauer DH; LaRue BL; Sajantila A; Patel J; Storts DR; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():38-47. PubMed ID: 25528025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Filipino DNA variation at 12 X-chromosome short tandem repeat markers.
Salvador JM; Apaga DLT; Delfin FC; Calacal GC; Dennis SE; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():e8-e12. PubMed ID: 29909139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application Progress of Massively Parallel Sequencing Technology in STR Genetic Marker Detection.
Tao RY; Dong XY; Chen AQ; Lü YH; Zhang SH; Li CT
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 38(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 35899518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mixture deconvolution by massively parallel sequencing of microhaplotypes.
Bennett L; Oldoni F; Long K; Cisana S; Madella K; Wootton S; Chang J; Hasegawa R; Lagacé R; Kidd KK; Podini D
Int J Legal Med; 2019 May; 133(3):719-729. PubMed ID: 30758713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance and concordance of the ForenSeq™ system for autosomal and Y chromosome short tandem repeat sequencing of reference-type specimens.
Just RS; Moreno LI; Smerick JB; Irwin JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():1-9. PubMed ID: 28126691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. STRsearch: a new pipeline for targeted profiling of short tandem repeats in massively parallel sequencing data.
Wang D; Tao R; Li Z; Pan D; Wang Z; Li C; Shi Y
Hereditas; 2020 Mar; 157(1):8. PubMed ID: 32172688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Illumina(®) Beta Version ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling.
Churchill JD; Schmedes SE; King JL; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():20-29. PubMed ID: 26433485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concordance study on Y-STRs typing between SeqStudio™ genetic analyzer for HID and MiSeq™ FGx forensic genomics system.
Soldati G; Turrina S; Treccani M; Saccardo C; Ausania F; De Leo D
Mol Biol Rep; 2023 Dec; 50(12):9779-9789. PubMed ID: 37812349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation into the sequence structure of 23 Y chromosomal STR loci using massively parallel sequencing.
Kwon SY; Lee HY; Kim EH; Lee EY; Shin KJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():132-141. PubMed ID: 27591816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of CE- and MPS-based analyses of forensic markers in a single cell after whole genome amplification.
Chen M; Zhang J; Zhao J; Chen T; Liu Z; Cheng F; Fan Q; Yan J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Mar; 45():102211. PubMed ID: 31812097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequence-based autosomal STR characterization in four US populations using PowerSeq™ Auto/Y system.
Silva DSBS; Scheible MK; Bailey SF; Williams CL; Allwood JS; Just RS; Schuetter J; Skomrock N; Minard-Smith A; Barker-Scoggins N; Eichman C; Meiklejohn K; Faith SA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102311. PubMed ID: 32531758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Massively parallel sequencing and capillary electrophoresis of a novel panel of falcon STRs: Concordance with minisatellite DNA profiles from historical wildlife crime.
Beasley J; Shorrock G; Neumann R; May CA; Wetton JH
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102550. PubMed ID: 34174583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current state-of-art of STR sequencing in forensic genetics.
Alonso A; Barrio PA; Müller P; Köcher S; Berger B; Martin P; Bodner M; Willuweit S; Parson W; Roewer L; Budowle B
Electrophoresis; 2018 Nov; 39(21):2655-2668. PubMed ID: 29750373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. toaSTR: A web application for forensic STR genotyping by massively parallel sequencing.
Ganschow S; Silvery J; Kalinowski J; Tiemann C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():21-28. PubMed ID: 30071493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Massively parallel sequencing of 10 autosomal STRs in Chinese using the ion torrent personal genome machine (PGM).
Zhao X; Li H; Wang Z; Ma K; Cao Y; Liu W
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():34-38. PubMed ID: 27497643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterizing the amplification of STR markers in multiplex polymerase chain displacement reaction using massively parallel sequencing.
Huang Y; Zhang H; Wei Y; Cao Y; Zhu Q; Li X; Shan T; Dai X; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102802. PubMed ID: 36332535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
