These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38087332)

  • 1. AI algorithms for accurate prediction of osteoporotic fractures in patients with diabetes: an up-to-date review.
    Li Z; Zhao W; Lin X; Li F
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):956. PubMed ID: 38087332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
    Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
    El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Chakhtoura M; Cauley JA; Chamoun N
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):397-424. PubMed ID: 28734709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
    Beaudoin C; Moore L; Gagné M; Bessette L; Ste-Marie LG; Brown JP; Jean S
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Apr; 30(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30877348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture prediction tools in diabetes.
    Agarwal A; Leslie WD
    Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2022 Aug; 29(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 35749735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal fracture prediction thresholds for therapy onset, established from FRAX and Garvan algorithms: a longitudinal observation of the population representative female cohort from the RAC-OST-POL Study.
    Pluskiewicz W; Werner A; Bach M; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Nov; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 37973685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Trabecular Bone Score-Adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment (TBS-FRAX) and FRAX Tools for Identification of High Fracture Risk among Taiwanese Adults Aged 50 to 90 Years with or without Prediabetes and Diabetes.
    Chuang TL; Chuang MH; Wang YF; Koo M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Nov; 58(12):. PubMed ID: 36556968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of common data model-based fracture prediction model using machine learning algorithm.
    Kong SH; Kim S; Kim Y; Kim JH; Kim K; Shin CS
    Osteoporos Int; 2023 Aug; 34(8):1437-1451. PubMed ID: 37195320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
    Tamaki J; Iki M; Kadowaki E; Sato Y; Kajita E; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Yoneshima H
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Dec; 22(12):3037-45. PubMed ID: 21279504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting fracture risk in osteoporosis: the use of fracture prediction tools in an osteoporosis clinic population.
    Aw D; Thain J; Ali A; Aung T; Chua WM; Sahota O; Weerasuriya N; Marshall L; Kearney F; Masud T
    Postgrad Med J; 2016 May; 92(1087):267-70. PubMed ID: 26792635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone mineral density enhances use of clinical risk factors in predicting ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese men: the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study.
    Bow CH; Tsang SW; Loong CH; Soong CS; Yeung SC; Kung AW
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Nov; 22(11):2799-807. PubMed ID: 21234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
    Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving Recognition of Fracture Risk in People with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Performance and Model Contribution of Two Common Risk Assessment Tools.
    Vizcarra P; Moreno A; Vivancos MJ; García AM; González RP; Gutiérrez F; Mata DC; Galindo P; Calzado S; Casado JL
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2023 Jan; 37(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 36576916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does diabetes modify the effect of FRAX risk factors for predicting major osteoporotic and hip fracture?
    Leslie WD; Morin SN; Lix LM; Majumdar SR
    Osteoporos Int; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2817-24. PubMed ID: 25092059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX: a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan.
    Vandenput L; Johansson H; McCloskey EV; Liu E; Åkesson KE; Anderson FA; Azagra R; Bager CL; Beaudart C; Bischoff-Ferrari HA; Biver E; Bruyère O; Cauley JA; Center JR; Chapurlat R; Christiansen C; Cooper C; Crandall CJ; Cummings SR; da Silva JAP; Dawson-Hughes B; Diez-Perez A; Dufour AB; Eisman JA; Elders PJM; Ferrari S; Fujita Y; Fujiwara S; Glüer CC; Goldshtein I; Goltzman D; Gudnason V; Hall J; Hans D; Hoff M; Hollick RJ; Huisman M; Iki M; Ish-Shalom S; Jones G; Karlsson MK; Khosla S; Kiel DP; Koh WP; Koromani F; Kotowicz MA; Kröger H; Kwok T; Lamy O; Langhammer A; Larijani B; Lippuner K; Mellström D; Merlijn T; Nordström A; Nordström P; O'Neill TW; Obermayer-Pietsch B; Ohlsson C; Orwoll ES; Pasco JA; Rivadeneira F; Schei B; Schott AM; Shiroma EJ; Siggeirsdottir K; Simonsick EM; Sornay-Rendu E; Sund R; Swart KMA; Szulc P; Tamaki J; Torgerson DJ; van Schoor NM; van Staa TP; Vila J; Wareham NJ; Wright NC; Yoshimura N; Zillikens MC; Zwart M; Harvey NC; Lorentzon M; Leslie WD; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2103-2136. PubMed ID: 35639106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study.
    Hippisley-Cox J; Coupland C
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e3427. PubMed ID: 22619194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FRAX tool in type 2 diabetic subjects: the use of HbA
    Valentini A; Cianfarani MA; De Meo L; Morabito P; Romanello D; Tarantino U; Federici M; Bertoli A
    Acta Diabetol; 2018 Oct; 55(10):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 29980834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive performance of the Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator: a registry-based cohort study.
    Agarwal A; Leslie WD; Nguyen TV; Morin SN; Lix LM; Eisman JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2022 Mar; 33(3):541-548. PubMed ID: 34839377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Muscle Strength and Physical Performance Improve Fracture Risk Prediction Beyond Garvan and FRAX: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.
    Alajlouni D; Tran T; Bliuc D; Blank RD; Cawthon PM; Orwoll ES; Center JR
    J Bone Miner Res; 2022 Mar; 37(3):411-419. PubMed ID: 34842309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.