BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38087704)

  • 1. Trends in access to minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancers.
    Seldomridge AN; Rasic G; Papageorge MV; Ng SC; de Geus SWL; Woods AP; McAneny D; Tseng JF; Sachs TE
    HPB (Oxford); 2024 Mar; 26(3):333-343. PubMed ID: 38087704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical Approach does not Affect Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Naffouje SA; Kamarajah SK; Denbo JW; Salti GI; Dahdaleh FS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Nov; 29(12):7793-7803. PubMed ID: 35960450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.
    Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Uijterwijk BA; Wei K; Kasai M; Ielpo B; Hilst JV; Chinnusamy P; Lemmers DHL; Burdio F; Senthilnathan P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Qin R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 37076411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
    Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
    Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Williams MD; Bhama AR; Naffouje S; Kamarajah SK; Becerra AZ; Zhang Y; Pappas SG; Dahdaleh FS
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jan; 27(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36357742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wehrle CJ; Chang JH; Gross AR; Woo K; Naples R; Stackhouse KA; Dahdaleh F; Augustin T; Joyce D; Simon R; Walsh RM; Naffouje SA
    Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2602-2610. PubMed ID: 38498210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility of simultaneous development of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Chao YJ; Lu WH; Liao TK; Su PJ; Wang CJ; Lai CH; Hung JY; Su PF; Shan YS
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6190. PubMed ID: 37062774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Propensity-Matched Analysis to Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    van Oosten AF; Ding D; Habib JR; Irfan A; Schmocker RK; Sereni E; Kinny-Köster B; Wright M; Groot VP; Molenaar IQ; Cameron JL; Makary M; Burkhart RA; Burns WR; Wolfgang CL; He J
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jul; 25(7):1795-1804. PubMed ID: 33201457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
    Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.
    Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma after the learning curve: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Chen H; Weng Y; Zhao S; Wang W; Ji Y; Peng C; Deng X; Shen B
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):821-829. PubMed ID: 38066192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes.
    Nassour I; Choti MA; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Wang SC; Polanco PM
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2907-2913. PubMed ID: 29280014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses.
    Kim H; Choi SH; Jang JY; Choi M; Lee JH; Kang CM
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):311-321. PubMed ID: 34773395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Robotic and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for the Elderly Patients-A Single Institutional Experience].
    Takeda Y; Ohmura Y; Katsura Y; Shinke G; Kinoshita M; Aoyama S; Kihara Y; Yanagisawa K; Katsuyama S; Ikeshima R; Hiraki M; Sugimura K; Masuzawa T; Hata T; Murata K
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2023 Dec; 50(13):1688-1690. PubMed ID: 38303174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends and disparities in access to minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (midp): an eight-year analysis from the national cancer database.
    Jehan FS; Khreiss M; Seth A; Aziz H
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jan; 18(1):52. PubMed ID: 38280048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Weng Y; Jiang Y; Fu N; Jin J; Shi Y; Huo Z; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3437-3448. PubMed ID: 32696148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early National Experience with Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy from the National Cancer Data Base.
    Sharpe SM; Talamonti MS; Wang CE; Prinz RA; Roggin KK; Bentrem DJ; Winchester DJ; Marsh RD; Stocker SJ; Baker MS
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 26095569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?
    Gumbs AA; Chouillard E; Abu Hilal M; Croner R; Gayet B; Gagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5256-5267. PubMed ID: 33146810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.