BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38087877)

  • 1. Minimally invasive autopsy in the evaluation of fetal malformations and stillbirths: A feasibility study.
    Gupta N; Langeh N; Sharma A; Mridha A; Jana M; Barwad A; Mani K; Dadhwal V; Kumar A; Deka D; Kabra M
    Birth Defects Res; 2024 Jan; 116(1):e2280. PubMed ID: 38087877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional vs virtual autopsy with postmortem MRI in phenotypic characterization of stillbirths and fetal malformations.
    Shruthi M; Gupta N; Jana M; Mridha AR; Kumar A; Agarwal R; Sharma R; Deka D; Gupta AK; Kabra M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):236-245. PubMed ID: 28295775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive autopsy for fetuses and children based on a combination of post-mortem MRI and endoscopic examination: a feasibility study.
    Lewis C; Hutchinson JC; Riddington M; Hill M; Arthurs OJ; Fisher J; Wade A; Doré CJ; Chitty LS; Sebire NJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Aug; 23(46):1-104. PubMed ID: 31461397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy.
    Kang X; Cannie MM; Arthurs OJ; Segers V; Fourneau C; Bevilacqua E; Cos Sanchez T; Sebire NJ; Jani JC
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3542-3553. PubMed ID: 28116518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic quality of 3Tesla postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with and without congenital heart disease.
    Ulm B; Dovjak GO; Scharrer A; Muin DA; Zimpfer D; Prayer D; Weber M; Berger-Kulemann V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):189.e1-189.e30. PubMed ID: 33662361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study.
    Thayyil S; Sebire NJ; Chitty LS; Wade A; Chong W; Olsen O; Gunny RS; Offiah AC; Owens CM; Saunders DE; Scott RJ; Jones R; Norman W; Addison S; Bainbridge A; Cady EB; Vita ED; Robertson NJ; Taylor AM;
    Lancet; 2013 Jul; 382(9888):223-33. PubMed ID: 23683720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of a minimally invasive autopsy for cause of death determination in stillborn babies and neonates in Mozambique: An observational study.
    Menendez C; Castillo P; Martínez MJ; Jordao D; Lovane L; Ismail MR; Carrilho C; Lorenzoni C; Fernandes F; Nhampossa T; Hurtado JC; Navarro M; Casas I; Santos Ritchie P; Bandeira S; Mocumbi S; Jaze Z; Mabota F; Munguambe K; Maixenchs M; Sanz A; Mandomando I; Nadal A; Goncé A; Muñoz-Almagro C; Quintó L; Vila J; Macete E; Alonso P; Ordi J; Bassat Q
    PLoS Med; 2017 Jun; 14(6):e1002318. PubMed ID: 28632735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal postmortem imaging: an overview of current techniques and future perspectives.
    Kang X; Carlin A; Cannie MM; Sanchez TC; Jani JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 223(4):493-515. PubMed ID: 32376319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of diagnostic performance for perinatal and paediatric post-mortem imaging: CT versus MRI.
    Arthurs OJ; Guy A; Thayyil S; Wade A; Jones R; Norman W; Scott R; Robertson NJ; Jacques TS; Chong WK; Gunny R; Saunders D; Olsen OE; Owens CM; Offiah AC; Chitty LS; Taylor AM; Sebire NJ;
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2327-36. PubMed ID: 26489748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS Protocol).
    Thayyil S; Sebire NJ; Chitty LS; Wade A; Olsen O; Gunny RS; Offiah A; Saunders DE; Owens CM; Chong WK; Robertson NJ; Taylor AM
    BMC Pediatr; 2011 Dec; 11():120. PubMed ID: 22192497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice.
    Addison S; Arthurs OJ; Thayyil S
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 87(1036):20130621. PubMed ID: 24288400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined prenatal US and post-mortem fetal MRI: can they replace conventional autopsy for fetal body abnormalities?
    Moeremans M; Avni FE; d'Haene N; Lam NM; Metens T; D'Hondt A
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):632-642. PubMed ID: 37526669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Socio-anthropological methods to study the feasibility and acceptability of the minimally invasive autopsy from the perspective of local communities: lessons learnt from a large multi-centre study.
    Maixenchs M; Anselmo R; Martínez Pérez G; Oruko K; Agnandji ST; Angoissa Minsoko PC; Diarra K; Djiteye M; Bhutta ZA; Zaidi S; Carrilho C; Sanz A; Ordi J; Menendez C; Bassat Q; Munguambe K
    Glob Health Action; 2019; 12(1):1559496. PubMed ID: 30712476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic value of virtual autopsy using pm-MRI at 3T on malformed second trimester fetuses vs classic autopsy.
    Staicu A; Albu C; Popa-Stanila R; Bondor CI; Rotar IC; Stamatian F; Muresan D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260357. PubMed ID: 34843527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy?
    Weustink AC; Hunink MG; van Dijke CF; Renken NS; Krestin GP; Oosterhuis JW
    Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):897-904. PubMed ID: 19244053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study.
    Cannie M; Votino C; Moerman P; Vanheste R; Segers V; Van Berkel K; Hanssens M; Kang X; Cos T; Kir M; Balepa L; Divano L; Foulon W; De Mey J; Jani J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 21919100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging with computed tomography-guided biopsy for foetuses and infants: a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study.
    Rüegger CM; Gascho D; Bode PK; Bruder E; Haslinger C; Ross S; Schmid K; Knöpfli C; Hofer LJ; Held L; Martinez RM; Bucher HU;
    BMC Pediatr; 2022 Aug; 22(1):464. PubMed ID: 35918685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy.
    Kang X; Cos T; Guizani M; Cannie MM; Segers V; Jani JC
    Prenat Diagn; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1106-10. PubMed ID: 24933243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed-methods study with bereaved parents.
    Lewis C; Riddington M; Hill M; Arthurs OJ; Hutchinson JC; Chitty LS; Bevan C; Fisher J; Ward J; Sebire NJ
    BJOG; 2019 May; 126(6):745-753. PubMed ID: 30576088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for early gestation fetuses: a validation study against conventional autopsy.
    Hutchinson JC; Kang X; Shelmerdine SC; Segers V; Lombardi CM; Cannie MM; Sebire NJ; Jani JC; Arthurs OJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):445.e1-445.e12. PubMed ID: 29410108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.