117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38087971)
1. Prostate Volume is A Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zou Q; Cao J; Chen Z; Wang S; Gu C; Li S; Xiang S
Urol J; 2024 Feb; 21(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 38087971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gan S; Liu J; Chen Z; Xiang S; Gu C; Li S; Wang S
Investig Clin Urol; 2022 Jul; 63(4):407-414. PubMed ID: 35670005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of "regression to the mean" using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates.
Altok M; Troncoso P; Achim MF; Matin SF; Gonzalez GN; Davis JW
Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 31115364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is small prostate volume a predictor of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy?
Chung MS; Lee SH; Lee DH; Chung BH
Yonsei Med J; 2013 Jul; 54(4):902-6. PubMed ID: 23709424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate volume effect on Gleason score upgrading in active surveillance appropriate patients.
Çamur E; Coşkun A; Kavukoğlu Ӧ; Can U; Kara Ö; Develi Çamur A; Sarıca K; Narter KF
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Upgrading of Gleason score and prostate volume: a clinicopathological analysis.
Kim KH; Lim SK; Shin TY; Lee JY; Chung BH; Rha KH; Hong SJ
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(8):1310-6. PubMed ID: 23452115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate Health Index (
Yan JQ; Huang D; Huang JY; Ruan XH; Lin XL; Fang ZJ; Gao Y; Jiang HW; Wu YS; Na R; Xu DF
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(4):406-410. PubMed ID: 34782549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wang Y; Chen X; Liu K; Liu R; Li L; Yin C; Song P
Urol Int; 2023; 107(5):460-479. PubMed ID: 36990065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio a predictor of Gleason score upgrading according to risk classifications in patients with prostate cancer.
Karadağ S; Ekşi M; Özdemir O; Akkaş F; Arikan Y; Özlü DN; Çolakoğlu Y; Aliş D; Şahin S; Tuğcu V
Arch Esp Urol; 2021 Jul; 74(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 34219063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative prostate health index predicts adverse pathology and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Novak V; Vesely S; Luksanová H; Prusa R; Capoun O; Fiala V; Dolejsová O; Sedlacková H; Kucera R; Stejskal J; Zalesky M; Babjuk M
BMC Urol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):144. PubMed ID: 32894109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Discrepancy between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Abedi AR; Basiri A; Shakhssalim N; Sadri G; Ahadi M; Hojjati SA; Sheykhzadeh S; Askarpour S; Ghiasy S
Urol J; 2020 Aug; 18(4):395-399. PubMed ID: 32798231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4.
Kim H; Kim JK; Hong SK; Jeong CW; Ku JH; Kwak C
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1825-1830. PubMed ID: 32869150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]