125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38088039)
1. Judicial Threats to
Mangan JG; Dennis AL
Psychiatr Serv; 2024 Jun; 75(6):589-593. PubMed ID: 38088039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the Courts to Shape Medicaid Policy: Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring and Its Community Integration Legacy.
Rosenbaum S
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Aug; 41(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 27127257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Olmstead's implementation: Differences in enforcement approaches.
Avila A; Spaulding WD; Evans EA
Psychol Serv; 2022 May; 19(2):243-251. PubMed ID: 34110868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The application of the Olmstead decision on housing and eldercare.
Palley E; Rozario PA
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):81-96. PubMed ID: 17804361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Realizing the Promise of
Schwartz SJ; Fleischner RD; Schwartz AZ; Stephens EM
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):63-100. PubMed ID: 32400309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking Choice Seriously in
Bagenstos SR
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):5-25. PubMed ID: 32400314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Constitutional Right to Community Services:
Ferleger D
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 32400311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Where We are on the Twentieth Anniversary of
Sloan L; Gulrajani C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 31811081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10.
Kershner S; Goico SW
J Leg Med; 2020; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 32400312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Olmstead decision and the journey toward integration:the evolution of social work responses.
Yong F
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2007; 49(1-2):115-26. PubMed ID: 17804363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008: implications for the forensic psychiatrist.
Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 20305081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forcing isolation: Medicare's "in the home" coverage standard for wheelchairs.
Medicare Rights Center
Care Manag J; 2005; 6(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 16447855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court confronts HIV: reflections on Bragdon v. Abbott.
Parmet WE
J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):225-40, 179. PubMed ID: 11066881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CRIPA, Olmstead, and the transformation of the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board.
Bloom JD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 22960921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court to rule on rights of people with disabilities.
Gold S
Caring; 1999 Jul; 18(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 10539554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating the disabled into the community in the wake of Olmstead.
Priaulx E
Caring; 2003 Sep; 22(9):6-10. PubMed ID: 14618898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. US: Supreme Court adopts narrow definition of "disability" under anti-discrimination law.
Elliott R
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 6(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 14979273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The judicial dismantling of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Gostin LO
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 12760112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
Coelho T
Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
