BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38088449)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus triage approaches among vaccinated women in Norway: A model-based analysis.
    Portnoy A; Pedersen K; Sy S; Tropé A; Engesaeter B; Kim JJ; Burger EA
    Int J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 154(6):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 38088449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
    Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-specific effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus screening versus cytology in a cervical cancer screening program: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
    Bao H; Ma L; Zhao Y; Song B; Di J; Wang L; Gao Y; Ren W; Wang S; Wu J; Wang HJ
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2022 Mar; 42(3):191-204. PubMed ID: 35142100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of using human papillomavirus 16/18 genotype triage in cervical cancer screening.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Goodman KA; Santas CC; Huh WK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 20713299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
    Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway.
    Burger EA; Ortendahl JD; Sy S; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 106(9):1571-8. PubMed ID: 22441643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
    Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
    Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of the screen-and-treat strategies using HPV test linked to thermal ablation for cervical cancer prevention in China: a modeling study.
    Zhao XL; Zhao S; Xia CF; Hu SY; Duan XZ; Liu ZH; Wang YY; You TT; Gao M; Qiao YL; Basu P; Zhao FH
    BMC Med; 2023 Apr; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 37069602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Triage of HPV-positive women in Norway using cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping and HPV persistence.
    Arbyn M; Rezhake R; Yuill S; Canfell K
    Br J Cancer; 2020 May; 122(11):1577-1579. PubMed ID: 32242099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening using results from two consecutive screening rounds.
    Polman NJ; Veldhuijzen NJ; Heideman DAM; Snijders PJF; Meijer CJLM; Berkhof J
    Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(9):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 30565673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
    Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.
    Lew JB; Simms KT; Smith MA; Hall M; Kang YJ; Xu XM; Caruana M; Velentzis LS; Bessell T; Saville M; Hammond I; Canfell K
    Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb; 2(2):e96-e107. PubMed ID: 29253402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination.
    Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Stout NK; Salomon JA; Kuntz KM; Goldie SJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):308-20. PubMed ID: 18314477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choosing wisely: a model-based analysis evaluating the trade-offs in cancer benefit and diagnostic referrals among alternative HPV testing strategies in Norway.
    Burger EA; Pedersen K; Sy S; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
    Br J Cancer; 2017 Sep; 117(6):783-790. PubMed ID: 28772279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
    Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
    Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
    PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adapting cervical cancer screening for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus infections: The value of stratifying guidelines.
    Pedersen K; Burger EA; Nygård M; Kristiansen IS; Kim JJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Mar; 91():68-75. PubMed ID: 29335156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.
    Kim JJ; Burger EA; Sy S; Campos NG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Feb; 109(2):. PubMed ID: 27754955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.