BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38088598)

  • 1. From Constitutional Protections to Medical Ethics: The Future of Pregnant Patients' Medical Self-Determination Rights After
    Sawicki NN; Kukura E
    J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):528-532. PubMed ID: 38088598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cruzan after Dobbs: What Remains of the Constitutional Right to Refuse Treatment?
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2023 Mar; 53(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 37092653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Law, morals and abortion: alternatives in light of the Supreme Court's decision.
    Degnan DA
    Commonweal; 1974 May; 100(13):305-8. PubMed ID: 11663441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Addressing challenges related to the professional practice of abortion post-Roe.
    Chervenak FA; Moreno JD; McLeod-Sordjan R; Bornstein E; Katz A; Pollet SL; Combs A; De Four Jones M; Lewis D; Bachmann G; Gordon MR; Warman A; Grünebaum A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 230(5):532-539. PubMed ID: 37914062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany.
    Morris DG
    Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Satris MJ
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical Practice in a Post-Roe World: A Guide for Social Workers.
    Reamer FG
    Soc Work; 2023 Mar; 68(2):150-158. PubMed ID: 36728474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-
    Wang Y; Weiss KJ
    Psychiatr Serv; 2024 Jul; 75(7):710-712. PubMed ID: 38835251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Critical Analysis of
    Manninen BA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):357-367. PubMed ID: 36647699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.
    Macklin R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of professional responsibility and fetal viability in the management of abortion.
    Chervenak F; McLeod-Sordjan R; Moreno JD; Pollet S; Bornstein E; Dudenhausen J; Grünebaum A
    J Perinat Med; 2024 Mar; 52(3):249-254. PubMed ID: 38342778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Two Front War on Reproductive Rights-When the Right to Abortion is Banned, Can the Right to Refuse Obstetrical Interventions Be Far behind?
    Minkoff H; Vullikanti RU; Marshall MF
    Am J Bioeth; 2024 Feb; 24(2):11-20. PubMed ID: 37830758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethical issues in prenatal diagnosis.
    Johnson SR; Elkins TE
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jun; 31(2):408-17. PubMed ID: 3402114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The "right" to an abortion, the scope of Fourteenth Amendment "personhood," and the Supreme Court's birth requirement.
    Gorby JD
    South Ill Univ Law J; 1979; 1979(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12083082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.