These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38088601)

  • 1. Where Does Life Begin? Discerning the Impact of
    Daar J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 38088601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-Dobbs legal conundrums surrounding preimplantation in vitro fertilization embryo dispositions.
    Crockin S; Altman AB; Rinehart L
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Jan; 119(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 36494203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies at the Nairobi In Vitro Fertilisation Centre.
    Noreh LJ; Tucs O; Sekadde-Kigondu CB; Noreh JA
    East Afr Med J; 2009 Apr; 86(4):156-61. PubMed ID: 20084998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†.
    Chambers GM; Dyer S; Zegers-Hochschild F; de Mouzon J; Ishihara O; Banker M; Mansour R; Kupka MS; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2921-2934. PubMed ID: 34601605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SARS-CoV-2 vs. human gametes, embryos and cryopreservation.
    Anifandis G; Messini CI; Simopoulou M; Sveronis G; Garas A; Daponte A; Messinis IE
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Aug; 67(4):260-269. PubMed ID: 34060390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A validated prediction score for having two or more embryos for cryopreservation following freeze-all IVF cycles: an analysis utilizing SART CORS database.
    Ibrahim Y; Stoddard GJ; Johnstone E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Feb; 38(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 33241427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Future developments in assisted reproduction in humans.
    Hardy K; Wright C; Rice S; Tachataki M; Roberts R; Morgan D; Spanos S; Taylor D
    Reproduction; 2002 Feb; 123(2):171-83. PubMed ID: 11866685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical counseling tool predicting supernumerary embryos after a fresh IVF cycle.
    Ibrahim Y; Stoddard G; Johnstone E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 May; 37(5):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 32152909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
    Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of in vitro fertilization-preimplantation genetic testing (IVF-PGT) funding policy on clinical outcome: An issue that stems beyond effectiveness of treatment.
    Shao YH; Zhang XY; Buckett W; Ao A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():1-5. PubMed ID: 30743159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study.
    Bhatt SJ; Marchetto NM; Roy J; Morelli SS; McGovern PG
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional IVF revisited: Is ICSI better for non-male factor infertility? Randomized controlled double blind study.
    Isikoglu M; Avci A; Kendirci Ceviren A; Aydınuraz B; Ata B
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Sep; 50(7):101990. PubMed ID: 33221561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of Assisted Reproductive Technologies for Pregnancy Outcomes in Mammals.
    Hansen PJ
    Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2020 Feb; 8():395-413. PubMed ID: 32069434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.
    Bosch E; De Vos M; Humaidan P
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():67. PubMed ID: 32153506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates.
    Wong KM; Mastenbroek S; Repping S
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jul; 102(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 24890275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic regulation of DNA methyltransferases in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos after assisted reproductive technologies.
    Petrussa L; Van de Velde H; De Rycke M
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 20(9):861-74. PubMed ID: 24994815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation.
    Borini A; Cattoli M; Bulletti C; Coticchio G
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1127():49-58. PubMed ID: 18443329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.