These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38088601)

  • 21. In vitro fertilization for cancer patients and survivors.
    Ginsburg ES; Yanushpolsky EH; Jackson KV
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):705-10. PubMed ID: 11287023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies.
    Luke B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):270-281. PubMed ID: 28322775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
    Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
    Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Lee M; Lofgren KT; Thomas A; Lanes A; Goldman R; Ginsburg ES; Hornstein MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):55.e1-55.e17. PubMed ID: 33539823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
    Palmerola KL; Vitez SF; Amrane S; Fischer CP; Forman EJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jan; 36(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 30362056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reproductive history does not compromise subsequent live birth and perinatal outcome following in-vitro fertilization: analysis of 25 329 first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
    Chen D; Xu Q; Mao X; Zhang J; Wu L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 62(3):430-438. PubMed ID: 37058394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A SART data cost-effectiveness analysis of planned oocyte cryopreservation versus in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy considering ideal family size.
    Bakkensen JB; Flannagan KSJ; Mumford SL; Hutchinson AP; Cheung EO; Moreno PI; Jordan N; Feinberg EC; Goldman KN
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Nov; 118(5):875-884. PubMed ID: 36175208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preimplantation genetic testing to reduce preterm births in assisted reproductive technology.
    Simpson JL; Rechitsky S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Jul; 150(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 32524593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The association between assisted reproductive technologies and low birth weight.
    Reig A; Seli E
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 31(3):183-187. PubMed ID: 30893135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of reproductive history on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome: evidence from the German IVF Registry.
    Kupka MS; Dorn C; Richter O; Felberbaum R; van der Ven H
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Sep; 80(3):508-16. PubMed ID: 12969690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproductive outcomes after in vitro fertilization treatment in a cohort of Danish women transplanted with cryopreserved ovarian tissue.
    Dueholm Hjorth IM; Kristensen SG; Dueholm M; Humaidan P
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Aug; 114(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 32624219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Current trends in human IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies.
    Kim MH
    Yonsei Med J; 1990 Jun; 31(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 2219978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of assisted reproductive technology after ovarian tissue transplantation in a cohort of 11 patients with or without associated infertility factors.
    Vatel M; Torre A; Paillusson B; Scheffler F; Bergere M; Benkhalifa M; Le Martelot MT; Leperlier F; Mirallié S; Selleret L; Prades-Borio M; Neuraz A; Barraud-Lange V; Boissel N; Fortin A; Poirot C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Feb; 38(2):503-511. PubMed ID: 33389379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology: a 6-year, single-center study.
    Bu Z; Xiong Y; Wang K; Sun Y
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):90-94. PubMed ID: 27001382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction.
    Jiang Z; Wang Y; Lin J; Xu J; Ding G; Huang H
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Oct; 44():90-104. PubMed ID: 28844405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lessons from elective in vitro fertilization (IVF) in, principally, non-infertile women.
    Gleicher N; Kim A; Weghofer A; Barad DH
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 22716082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.
    Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trends in ectopic pregnancy rates following assisted reproductive technologies in the UK: a 12-year nationwide analysis including 160 000 pregnancies.
    Santos-Ribeiro S; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 26724796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.
    Gerber RS; Fazzari M; Kappy M; Cohen A; Galperin S; Lieman H; Jindal S; Buyuk E
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 33012553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.