These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38088611)
21. A Critical Analysis of Manninen BA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):357-367. PubMed ID: 36647699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Otolaryngologists and Reproductive Rights. Yalamanchi P; Faucett EA; Shuman AG Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Nov; 169(5):1393-1396. PubMed ID: 37210612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Morgentaler judgment: constitutional rights, legislative intention, and institutional design. Weinrib LE Univ Tor Law J; 1992; 42(1):22-76. PubMed ID: 11656266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ahmed A; Evans DP; Jackson J; Meier BM; Tomori C J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):485-489. PubMed ID: 38088610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom. Ellis DA Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences. Koslov TI Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Recent developments in abortion law in industrialized countries. Boland R Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):404-18. PubMed ID: 2089193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of the Supreme Court decisions on the performance of abortions in the United States. Hirsh HL Forensic Sci; 1974 Jun; 3(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 4842022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health. Steinberg TN Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):483-517. PubMed ID: 2699161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Silent no more: physicians' legal and ethical obligations to patients seeking abortions. Law SA Rev Law Soc Change; 1994-1995; 21(2):279-321. PubMed ID: 11660619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Criminal abortion revisited. Buell SW N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. From Constitutional Protections to Medical Ethics: The Future of Pregnant Patients' Medical Self-Determination Rights After Sawicki NN; Kukura E J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):528-532. PubMed ID: 38088598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Rust v Sullivan: legal issues and ethical concerns. Spielman B Womens Health Issues; 1991; 1(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 1822812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]