230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38088627)
1. INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After
Ahmed A; Huberfeld N; McClain LC
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 38088627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Justice Blackmun and legal abortion--a besieged legacy to women's reproductive health.
Cates W; Grimes DA; Hogue LL
Am J Public Health; 1995 Sep; 85(9):1204-6. PubMed ID: 7661225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential Effects of
Hall TS
Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
Koslov TI
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
Benshoof J
JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
Clark BR
Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Critical Analysis of
Manninen BA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):357-367. PubMed ID: 36647699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
Bezanson RP
Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
Henry KS
Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The nature of the right to an abortion: a commentary on Professor Brownstein's analysis of Casey.
West RL
Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):961-7. PubMed ID: 11656423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "A Vigorous Campaign against Abortion": Views of American Leaders of Eugenics v. Supreme Court Distortions.
Lombardo PA
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 38088609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion and a nation at war.
First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.
Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
