These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38089188)

  • 1. An exploration of applicant perceptions of asynchronous video MMIs in medical selection.
    Zibarras L; Patterson F; Holmes J; Flaxman C; Kubacki A
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():285. PubMed ID: 38089188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asynchronous Video Interviewing as a New Technology in Personnel Selection: The Applicant's Point of View.
    Brenner FS; Ortner TM; Fay D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():863. PubMed ID: 27378969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews.
    Bye HH; Sandal GM
    J Bus Psychol; 2016; 31(4):569-582. PubMed ID: 27881901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-sectional evaluation of an asynchronous multiple mini-interview (MMI) in selection to health professions training programmes with 10 principles for fairness built-in.
    Callwood A; Harris J; Gillam L; Roberts S; Kubacki A; Christidis A; Tiffin PA
    BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e074440. PubMed ID: 37907294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.
    Nørskov S; Damholdt MF; Ulhøi JP; Jensen MB; Ess C; Seibt J
    Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():586263. PubMed ID: 33501344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population--a mixed methods study.
    Kelly ME; Dowell J; Husbands A; Newell J; O'Flynn S; Kropmans T; Dunne FP; Murphy AW
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Dec; 14():267. PubMed ID: 25528046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: a field investigation.
    Chapman DS; Uggerslev KL; Webster J
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Oct; 88(5):944-53. PubMed ID: 14516254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Residency Applicant Perceptions of Multiple Mini Interviews in Post-Graduate Year 1 Residency Interviews.
    Szwak JA; Rotolo S; Soni HP
    Innov Pharm; 2022; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36654716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review of stakeholder views of selection methods for medical schools admission.
    Kelly ME; Patterson F; O'Flynn S; Mulligan J; Murphy AW
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):139. PubMed ID: 29907112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of Asynchronous Video Interviews for Selecting Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.
    Breitkopf DM; Green IC; Hopkins MR; Torbenson VE; Camp CL; Turner NS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 134 Suppl 1():9S-15S. PubMed ID: 31568035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Multiple Mini Interview for admission to nursing - male perspectives.
    Traynor M; McGowan I; Gillespie K
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():283. PubMed ID: 38089213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple mini interview (MMI) for general practice training selection in Australia: interviewers' motivation.
    Burgess A; Roberts C; Sureshkumar P; Mossman K
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jan; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 29370852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits and Feasibility of Using Videos to Assess Medical School Applicants' Empathetic Abilities in Multiple Mini Interviews.
    Kim KJ; Lee NY; Kwon BS
    Med Sci Educ; 2021 Feb; 31(1):175-181. PubMed ID: 33251038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools.
    Jerant A; Henderson MC; Griffin E; Rainwater JA; Hall TR; Kelly CJ; Peterson EM; Wofsy D; Franks P
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):190. PubMed ID: 29110662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robots are judging me: Perceived fairness of algorithmic recruitment tools.
    Hilliard A; Guenole N; Leutner F
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():940456. PubMed ID: 35959005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Employing Multiple Mini Interviews in Selection Processes for Psychology Professional Training Programs: Ten Tips for Effective Implementation.
    Oxlad M; Roberts R; Chur-Hansen A; Proeve M; Auton J; Sarris A; Tabe A
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2020; 9():192. PubMed ID: 38073773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internet-based multiple mini-interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes.
    Tiller D; O'Mara D; Rothnie I; Dunn S; Lee L; Roberts C
    Med Educ; 2013 Aug; 47(8):801-10. PubMed ID: 23837426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applicant perceptions of new selection systems are a function of their performance in the selection procedure.
    Gardner AK; Dunkin BJ
    Am J Surg; 2019 Feb; 217(2):272-275. PubMed ID: 30297126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission.
    Yamada T; Sato J; Yoshimura H; Okubo T; Hiraoka E; Shiga T; Kubota T; Fujitani S; Machi J; Ban N
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 28302124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.