These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3808920)

  • 1. Results of the pilot phase of a clinical evaluation of computer aided design of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets.
    Holden JM; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Dec; 10(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 3808920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental fittings of sockets for below-knee amputees using computer aided design and manufacturing techniques.
    Foort J; Spiers R; Bannon M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 4000912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided socket design for trans-femoral amputees.
    Travis RP; Dewar ME
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 8134277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets: a comparison between CAD CAM and conventionally produced sockets.
    Oberg T; Lilja M; Johansson T; Karsznia A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8134276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CAD/CAM evaluation of the fit of trans-tibial sockets for trans-tibial amputation stumps.
    Isozaki K; Hosoda M; Masuda T; Morita S
    J Med Dent Sci; 2006 Mar; 53(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16722145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of computer aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1990 Dec; 14(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 2128892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in prosthetics.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Jul; (256):39-43. PubMed ID: 2364620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a quantitative method for defining CAD/CAM socket modifications.
    Lemaire ED; Bexiga P; Johnson F; Solomonidis SE; Paul JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 10355641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided design and manufacture of an above-knee amputee socket.
    Torres-Moreno R; Saunders CG; Foort J; Morrison JB
    J Biomed Eng; 1991 Jan; 13(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 2002669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
    Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of alignment perturbations in a trans-tibial prosthesis user: A pilot study.
    Courtney A; Orendurff MS; Buis A
    J Rehabil Med; 2016 Apr; 48(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 26983760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the patellar tendon bar in the trans-tibial patellar-tendon-bearing prosthesis socket.
    Kim WD; Lim D; Hong KS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Apr; 27(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 12812325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influences and trends of various shape-capture methods on outcomes in trans-tibial prosthetics: A systematic review.
    Suyi Yang E; Aslani N; McGarry A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):540-555. PubMed ID: 31364475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of CAD-CAM and hand made sockets for PTB prostheses.
    Köhler P; Lindh L; Netz P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Apr; 13(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2717380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study.
    Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of fluid insert volume changes on socket pressures and shear stresses: case studies from two trans-tibial amputee subjects.
    Sanders JE; Jacobsen AK; Fergason JR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 17162516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?
    Sanders JE; Severance MR; Allyn KJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):567-82. PubMed ID: 22773260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An experimental and theoretical framework for manufacturing prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees.
    Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Crawford RH; Rogers WE; Bosker G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 17009490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer aided design of prosthetic sockets for below-knee amputees.
    Saunders CG; Foort J; Bannon M; Lean D; Panych L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 4000906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advanced trans-tibial socket fabrication using selective laser sintering.
    Rogers B; Bosker GW; Crawford RH; Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Walden G; Gitter AJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Mar; 31(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 17365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.