These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38089922)

  • 21. Development and Validation of a Scoring System That Includes Corrected QT Interval for Risk Analysis of Patients With Cirrhosis and Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Biselli M; Gramenzi A; Lenzi B; Dall'Agata M; Pierro ML; Perricone G; Tonon M; Bellettato L; D'Amico G; Angeli P; Boffelli S; Bonavita ME; Domenicali M; Caraceni P; Bernardi M; Trevisani F
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jun; 17(7):1388-1397.e1. PubMed ID: 30557740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An External Validation Study of the Oakland and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in an Asian Population.
    Quach DT; Vo UP; Nguyen NT; Le LT; Vo MH; Ho PT; Nguyen TN; Bo PK; Nguyen NH; Vu KT; Van Dang M; Dinh MC; Nguyen TQ; Van Nguyen X; Le ST; Tran CP
    Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2021; 2021():8674367. PubMed ID: 33505461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?
    Budimir I; Stojsavljević S; Baršić N; Bišćanin A; Mirošević G; Bohnec S; Kirigin LS; Pavić T; Ljubičić N
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 23(41):7450-7458. PubMed ID: 29151699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Two Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Taiwanese Population.
    Wang CH; Hung MS; Wu KH; Chen YC
    J Acute Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):115-121. PubMed ID: 32995182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.
    Hyett BH; Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Kumar NL; Brozovic S; Claggett BL; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative study of scoring systems that accurately predict the prognosis of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Yeon SH; Moon HS; Choi SW; Kang SH; Sung JK; Jeong HY
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Feb; 38(1):51. PubMed ID: 36806639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MAP(ASH): A new scoring system for the prediction of intervention and mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Redondo-Cerezo E; Vadillo-Calles F; Stanley AJ; Laursen S; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Jiménez-Rosales R
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Jan; 35(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 31359521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simple clinical predictors may obviate urgent endoscopy in selected patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Romagnuolo J; Barkun AN; Enns R; Armstrong D; Gregor J
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Feb; 167(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 17296882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. RHEMITT score: Predicting the risk of mid gastrointestinal rebleeding after small bowel capsule endoscopy: A prospective validation.
    de Sousa Magalhães R; Sousa-Pinto B; Boal Carvalho P; Rosa B; Moreira MJ; Cotter J
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Feb; 37(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 34555864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ABC score is an effective predictor of outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding.
    Sakong H; Moon HS; Choi SW; Kang SH; Sung JK; Jeong HY
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Dec; 101(49):e31541. PubMed ID: 36626500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Prospective validation of the Rockall Scoring System in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Cayetano Heredia Hospital Lima- Peru].
    Espinoza Ríos J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J; Lindo Ricce M; García Encinas C; Rios Matteucci S; Vila Gutierrez S; Pinto Valdivia J; De Los Rios Senmache R; Piscoya Rivera A; Bussalleu Rivera A
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2009; 29(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 19609325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Yang HM; Jeon SW; Jung JT; Lee DW; Ha CY; Park KS; Lee SH; Yang CH; Park JH; Park YS;
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jan; 31(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 26211939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. External validation of the Oakland Score to assess safe hospital discharge among adult patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in a single New Zealand Centre.
    Amer M; Haddow JB
    ANZ J Surg; 2024 Apr; 94(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 38059545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk assessment in acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding: the AIMS65 score in comparison with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in a Scottish population.
    Palmer AJ; Moroni F; Mcleish S; Campbell G; Bardgett J; Round J; McMullan C; Rashid M; Clark R; De Las Heras D; Vincent C
    Frontline Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 7(2):90-96. PubMed ID: 28839841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk factors for rebleeding in gastroduodenal ulcers.
    Ito N; Funasaka K; Fujiyoshi T; Nishida K; Satta Y; Furukawa K; Kakushima N; Furune S; Ishikawa E; Mizutani Y; Sawada T; Maeda K; Ishikawa T; Yamamura T; Ohno E; Nakamura M; Miyahara R; Sasaki Y; Haruta JI; Fujishiro M; Kawashima H
    Ir J Med Sci; 2024 Feb; 193(1):173-179. PubMed ID: 37432526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the need for intervention and outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Brazilian setting: a prospective study.
    Custódio Lima J; Garcia Montes C; Kibune Nagasako C; Soares Ruppert Reis GF; Meirelles Dos Santos JO; Guerrazzi F; Mesquita MA
    Digestion; 2013; 88(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 24335273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of three different risk scoring systems in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Camellini L; Merighi A; Pagnini C; Azzolini F; Guazzetti S; Scarcelli A; Manenti F; Rigo GP
    Dig Liver Dis; 2004 Apr; 36(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 15115340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation and Comparison of the Japanese Score and Other Scores in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Study.
    Choi SW; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Sakong H; Kang SH; Sung JK; Jeong HY
    Dig Dis; 2023; 41(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 35901784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.