127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38090472)
1. Radiation exposure of Staff handling
Mosima L; Muzamhindo N; Lundie M; Summers B
Health SA; 2023; 28():2211. PubMed ID: 38090472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nuclear medicine staff exposure to ionising radiation in
Pavičar B; Davidović J; Petrović B; Vuleta G; Trivić S; Šajinović V; Egeljić-Mihailović N; Todorović N; Predojević B
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2021 Sep; 72(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 34587667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation dose to technicians per nuclear medicine procedure: comparison between technetium-99m, gallium-67, and iodine-131 radiotracers and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose.
Chiesa C; De Sanctis V; Crippa F; Schiavini M; Fraigola CE; Bogni A; Pascali C; Decise D; Marchesini R; Bombardieri E
Eur J Nucl Med; 1997 Nov; 24(11):1380-9. PubMed ID: 9371871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Investigations of radiation exposure of the medical personnel during F-18-FDG PET studies].
Linemann H; Will E; Beuthien-Baumann B
Nuklearmedizin; 2000; 39(3):77-81. PubMed ID: 10834195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of Radiation Exposure to Workers During [
Al-Aamria M; Al-Balushia N; Bailey D
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Dec; 50(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31447232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occupational exposure in a PET/CT facility using two different automatic infusion systems.
Skovorodko K; Bareikė M; Gudelis A; Gricienė B
Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():169-175. PubMed ID: 32866778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-Evaluation of Patient-Sourced Radiation Doses in PET/CT.
Şenışık AM; Kökkülünk HT; Yüksel M
Curr Radiopharm; 2023; 16(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 36593536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose rates from patients undergoing PET: implications for technologists and waiting areas.
Benatar NA; Cronin BF; O'Doherty MJ
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 May; 27(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 10853815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [External exposure of hot cell operators in nuclear medicine].
Sichirollo AE; Bombardieri E; Cortona G; Marchesini R
Radiol Med; 1998 Dec; 96(6):612-7. PubMed ID: 10189927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting radiation exposure dose in nursing staff during (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Ito K; Suzuki M; Yamazaki A; Suzuki Y; Yokokawa N; Oosawa T; Tokumaru AM
J Occup Health; 2015; 57(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 26016535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are restrictions to behaviour of patients required following fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic studies?
Cronin B; Marsden PK; O'Doherty MJ
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Feb; 26(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 9933345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of extremity dose for medical staff involved in positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging: Retrospective study.
Erdemir RU; Abuzaid MM; Cavli B; Tekin HO; Elshami W
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35501. PubMed ID: 37904454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multi-institutional assessment of eye lens dose in nuclear medicine clinics.
Abuqbeitah M; Demir M; Işikci NI; Kozanlilar B; Kovan B; Yeyin N; Fikret Çermik T; Şanli Y; Sönmezoğlu K
Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Sep; 44(9):772-776. PubMed ID: 37464817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of adopting good radiation practices in reducing the whole body radiation dose to the nuclear medicine personnel during (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
Verma S; Kheruka SC; Maurya AK; Kumar N; Gambhir S; Kumari S
Indian J Nucl Med; 2016; 31(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 26917890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Measurement of radiation exposure to a PET institution driver from patients injected with FDG].
Nakamura F; Kanno T; Okada H; Yoshikawa E; Andou I; Futatsubashi M; Shinke T; Ouchi Y; Torizuka T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Aug; 62(8):1105-10. PubMed ID: 16957665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective dose to staff members in a positron emission tomography/CT facility using zirconium-89.
Alzimami KS; Ma AK
Br J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 86(1030):20130318. PubMed ID: 23934963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation Exposure to the Personnel Performing Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification Study Using
Rana N; Srivastava A; Kumar M; Parmar M; Kumar R; Mittal BR
Indian J Nucl Med; 2023; 38(4):362-365. PubMed ID: 38390544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography-computed tomography centers in Egypt.
Ahmed IES; Zamzam AMM; Yassin HM
World J Nucl Med; 2019; 18(3):287-292. PubMed ID: 31516373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occupational per-patient radiation dose from a conservative protocol for veterinary (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Martinez NE; Kraft SL; Gibbons DS; Arceneaux BK; Stewart JA; Mama KR; Johnson TE
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 22703227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
