These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38090788)
1. Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial. Draucker C; CarriĆ³n A; Ott MA; Knopf A JMIR Form Res; 2023 Dec; 7():e51202. PubMed ID: 38090788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research. De Vries R; Stanczyk A; Wall IF; Uhlmann R; Damschroder LJ; Kim SY Soc Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 70(12):1896-1903. PubMed ID: 20378225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the quality of deliberative stakeholder consultations involving allied health professionals in pediatric palliative care and hematology/oncology in Canada. Rahimzadeh V; Longo C; Gagnon J; Fernandez C; Bartlett G BMC Palliat Care; 2021 Dec; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 34906102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing a deliberative democracy method with citizens of African ancestry to weigh pros and cons of targeted screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk. Guan Y; Pathak S; Ballard D; Veluswamy JK; McCullough LE; McBride CM; Gornick MC Front Public Health; 2022; 10():984926. PubMed ID: 36424974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethics. De Vries R; Stanczyk AE; Ryan KA; Kim SY J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Sep; 6(3):3-17. PubMed ID: 21931233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public Deliberation Process on Patient Perspectives on Health Information Sharing: Evaluative Descriptive Study. Raj M; Ryan K; Nong P; Calhoun K; Trinidad MG; De Vries R; Creary M; Spector-Bagdady K; Kardia SLR; Platt J JMIR Cancer; 2022 Sep; 8(3):e37793. PubMed ID: 36112409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deliberations with American Indian and Alaska Native People about the Ethics of Genomics: An Adapted Model of Deliberation Used with Three Tribal Communities in the United States. Blacksher E; Hiratsuka VY; Blanchard JW; Lund JR; Reedy J; Beans JA; Saunkeah B; Peercy M; Byars C; Yracheta J; Tsosie KS; O'Leary M; Ducheneaux G; Spicer PG AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(3):164-178. PubMed ID: 34125006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21645188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulating Gene Editing in the Wild: Building Regulatory Capacity to Incorporate Deliberative Democracy. Maschke KJ; Gusmano MK Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S42-S47. PubMed ID: 34905250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation. Walmsley HL Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jul; 73(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 21683492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial. Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation. O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(4):203-15. PubMed ID: 19367089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Self-Interest in Deliberation: A Theory of Deliberative Capital. Afsahi A Polit Stud (Oxf); 2022 Aug; 70(3):701-718. PubMed ID: 35941966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Quality of the Deliberation in Moral Case Deliberations: A Coding Scheme. Jellema H; Kremer S; Mackor AR; Molewijk B Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):277-285. PubMed ID: 28417521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Abelson J; Forest PG; Eyles J; Smith P; Martin E; Gauvin FP Soc Sci Med; 2003 Jul; 57(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 12765705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation. Stolper M; Molewijk B; Widdershoven G BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Jul; 17(1):45. PubMed ID: 27448597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health professionals' perspectives on breast cancer risk stratification: understanding evaluation of risk versus screening for disease. Puzhko S; Gagnon J; Simard J; Knoppers BM; Siedlikowski S; Bartlett G Public Health Rev; 2019; 40():2. PubMed ID: 30858992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Public Deliberation as a Novel Method for an Exception From Informed Consent Community Consultation. Powers PE; Shore KK; Perez S; Ritley D; Kuppermann N; Holmes JF; Tzimenatos LS; Shawargga H; Nishijima DK Acad Emerg Med; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1158-1168. PubMed ID: 31271691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing and applying a deductive coding framework to assess the goals of Citizen/Community Jury deliberations. Scott AM; Sims R; Degeling C; Carter S; Thomas R Health Expect; 2019 Jun; 22(3):537-546. PubMed ID: 30864216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]