These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38090788)

  • 21. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.
    Burgess M; O'Doherty K; Secko D
    Per Med; 2008 May; 5(3):285-296. PubMed ID: 29783499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Integrating Public Health and Deliberative Public Bioethics: Lessons from the Human Genome Project Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program.
    Meagher KM; Lee LM
    Public Health Rep; 2016; 131(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26843669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
    De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Community engagement for big epidemiology: deliberative democracy as a tool.
    McWhirter RE; Critchley CR; Nicol D; Chalmers D; Whitton T; Otlowski M; Burgess MM; Dickinson JL
    J Pers Med; 2014 Nov; 4(4):459-74. PubMed ID: 25563457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exploring prospects of deliberation in intractable natural resource management conflicts.
    Johansson A; Lindahl KB; Zachrisson A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115205. PubMed ID: 35533469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies.
    Kim SY; Wall IF; Stanczyk A; De Vries R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Dec; 4(4):3-16. PubMed ID: 19919315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Public's approach to surrogate consent for dementia research: cautious pragmatism.
    De Vries R; Ryan KA; Stanczyk A; Appelbaum PS; Damschroder L; Knopman DS; Kim SY
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2013 Apr; 21(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 23498383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The challenges of ethical deliberation in palliative care settings: A descriptive study.
    Dumont S; Turcotte V; Aubin M; Casimiro L; Lavoie M; Picard L
    Palliat Support Care; 2022 Apr; 20(2):212-220. PubMed ID: 35574913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How to evaluate the quality of an ethical deliberation? A pragmatist proposal for evaluation criteria and collaborative research.
    Senghor AS; Racine E
    Med Health Care Philos; 2022 Sep; 25(3):309-326. PubMed ID: 35679005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices.
    Reedy J; Orr R; Spicer P; Blanchard JW; Hiratsuka VY; Ketchum TS; Saunkeah B; Wark K; Woodbury RB
    Humanit Soc Sci Commun; 2020; 7():. PubMed ID: 33954295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking.
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Potts A; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 22179074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The public and public health organizations: issues for community engagement in public health.
    Scutchfield FD; Hall L; Ireson CL
    Health Policy; 2006 Jun; 77(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 16139924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of Community and Culture in the Ethical Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in a Pandemic Situation: Deliberative Democracy Study.
    Schoch-Spana M; Brunson EK; Gwon H; Regenberg A; Toner ES; Daugherty-Biddison EL
    J Particip Med; 2020 Mar; 12(1):e18272. PubMed ID: 33064107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Promises and perils of public deliberation: contrasting two national bioethics commissions on embryonic stem cell research.
    Cohen CB
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2005 Sep; 15(3):269-88. PubMed ID: 16250108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics.
    Schiavone G; Mameli M; Boniolo G
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jul; 24(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26059953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research.
    Kim SY; Kim HM; Knopman DS; De Vries R; Damschroder L; Appelbaum PS
    Neurology; 2011 Dec; 77(24):2097-104. PubMed ID: 21975207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods.
    Fishkin JS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S19-S24. PubMed ID: 34905249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: five lessons from British Columbia.
    Walmsley H
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):452-68. PubMed ID: 20977183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Health technology adoption and the politics of governance in the UK.
    Milewa T
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Dec; 63(12):3102-12. PubMed ID: 16982120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.