These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38091159)

  • 1. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a tantalum cage: lumbar lordosis redistribution and sacral slope restoration with a modified posterior technique.
    Ferraro M; Puglia F; Della Valle A; Cerbone V; Cicatelli A; Peroni DR; Cecconi D; Misaggi B; La Maida GA
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2023 Dec; 24(1):62. PubMed ID: 38091159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Du CZ; Li S; Xu L; Zhou QS; Zhu ZZ; Sun X; Qiu Y
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 May; 14(1):148. PubMed ID: 31122245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].
    Sun X; Zeng R; Li G; Wei B; Hu Z; Lin H; Chen G; Chen S; Sun J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1504-9. PubMed ID: 27044219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) influence functional outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in isthmic spondylolisthesis?
    Ali EMS; El-Hewala TA; Eladawy AM; Sheta RA
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 May; 17(1):272. PubMed ID: 35570302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter assessment of outcomes and complications associated with transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion for fractional curve correction.
    Buell TJ; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Lafage V; Lafage R; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Kelly MP; Daniels AH; Gum JL; Soroceanu A; Hamilton DK; Gupta MC; Burton DC; Hostin RA; Kebaish KM; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Ames CP; Smith JS;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Dec; 35(6):729-742. PubMed ID: 34416723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the early fate of adjacent segmental lordosis compensation at L3-4 and L5-S1 following a lateral versus transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5?
    Kim M; Kumar R; Drolet CE; Bs MA; Hanks T; Yamaguchi K; Krause K; Nemani VM; Leveque JC; Louie PK
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Sep; 33(9):3503-3508. PubMed ID: 38965087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term Radiological and Clinical Outcome after Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Patients with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective 6-Year Follow-up Study.
    Bredow J; Meyer C; Oikonomidis S; Kernich C; Kernich N; Hofstetter CP; Heck VJ; Eysel P; Prasse T
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 35711118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Salem KMI; Eranki AP; Paquette S; Boyd M; Street J; Kwon BK; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 29451437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of preoperative age-adjusted sagittal imbalance on radiographic and clinical outcomes following 1-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Maayan O; Subramanian T; Samuel AM; Shahi P; Vaishnav AS; Asada T; Amen TB; Tuma OC; Korsun MK; Singh N; Pajak A; Singh S; Araghi K; Sheha ED; Dowdell JE; Iyer S; Qureshi SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Oct; 41(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 39094190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which lumbar interbody fusion technique is better in terms of level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis?
    Kim JS; Lee KY; Lee SH; Lee HY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 20121352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion achieve a better clinical and radiological outcome than traditional open technique in isthmic spondylolisthesis?
    Ali EMS; Eladawy AM; ElHewala T
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Aug; 19(1):523. PubMed ID: 39210403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study.
    Kadam A; Wigner N; Saville P; Arlet V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):650-660. PubMed ID: 28960160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.