These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38091272)

  • 21. Does good perception of vocal characteristics relate to better speech-on-speech intelligibility for cochlear implant users?
    El Boghdady N; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):417. PubMed ID: 30710943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlation between Voice and Auditory Processing.
    Ramos JS; Feniman MR; Gielow I; Silverio KCA
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):771.e25-771.e36. PubMed ID: 28967586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.
    Mackersie CL; Dewey J; Guthrie LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):1006-19. PubMed ID: 21877813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Voice of hearing impaired children and adolescents and hearing peers: influence of speech auditory perception on vocal production.
    Delgado-Pinheiro EMC; Bonbonati JC; Santos FRD; Fabron EMG
    Codas; 2020; 32(4):e20180227. PubMed ID: 32756851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of lexical content, acoustic and linguistic variability, and vocoding on voice cue perception.
    Koelewijn T; Gaudrain E; Tamati T; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):1620. PubMed ID: 34598602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The discrimination of voice cues in simulations of bimodal electro-acoustic cochlear-implant hearing.
    Başkent D; Luckmann A; Ceha J; Gaudrain E; Tamati TN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):EL292. PubMed ID: 29716273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds.
    David M; Tausend AN; Strelcyk O; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():118-128. PubMed ID: 29602593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prosodic Differences in the Voices of Transgender and Cisgender Women: Self-Perception of Voice - An Auditory and Acoustic Analysis.
    Menezes DP; de Lira ZS; Araújo ANB; de Almeida AAF; Gomes AOC; Moraes BT; Lucena JA
    J Voice; 2024 Jul; 38(4):844-857. PubMed ID: 35135714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory signal processing in communication: perception and performance of vocal sounds.
    Prather JF
    Hear Res; 2013 Nov; 305():144-55. PubMed ID: 23827717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.
    Jiam NT; Caldwell M; Deroche ML; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 352():30-39. PubMed ID: 28088500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre and Fundamental Frequency Cues to the Perception of Voice Gender and Age in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Skuk VG; Kirchen L; Oberhoffner T; Guntinas-Lichius O; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):3155-3175. PubMed ID: 32881631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual analysis of the male-to-female transgender voice after glottoplasty-the telephone test.
    Meister J; Kühn H; Shehata-Dieler W; Hagen R; Kleinsasser N
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Apr; 127(4):875-881. PubMed ID: 27334765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Voice gender perception by cochlear implantees.
    Kovacić D; Balaban E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):762-75. PubMed ID: 19640042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Independent and Combined Effects of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Differences for School-Age Children's Sentence Recognition in a Two-Talker Masker.
    Flaherty MM; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 64(1):206-217. PubMed ID: 33375828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Litovsky RY
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15117. PubMed ID: 34302032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.
    Chatterjee M; Peng SC
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 18093766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Representation of speech in human auditory cortex: is it special?
    Steinschneider M; Nourski KV; Fishman YI
    Hear Res; 2013 Nov; 305():57-73. PubMed ID: 23792076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Responses of Middle-Frequency Modulations in Vocal Fundamental Frequency to Different Vocal Intensities and Auditory Feedback.
    Lee SH; Fang TJ; Yu JF; Lee GS
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):536-544. PubMed ID: 28268129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.