159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38092052)
1. Benchmarking and improving the performance of variant-calling pipelines with RecallME.
Vozza G; Bonetti E; Tini G; Favalli V; Frigè G; Bucci G; De Summa S; Zanfardino M; Zapelloni F; Mazzarella L
Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 39(12):. PubMed ID: 38092052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benchmarking workflows to assess performance and suitability of germline variant calling pipelines in clinical diagnostic assays.
Krishnan V; Utiramerur S; Ng Z; Datta S; Snyder MP; Ashley EA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 33627090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ToTem: a tool for variant calling pipeline optimization.
Tom N; Tom O; Malcikova J; Pavlova S; Kubesova B; Rausch T; Kolarik M; Benes V; Bystry V; Pospisilova S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):243. PubMed ID: 29940847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Set-theory based benchmarking of three different variant callers for targeted sequencing.
Molina-Mora JA; Solano-Vargas M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):20. PubMed ID: 33413082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. VarBen: Generating in Silico Reference Data Sets for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Pipeline Evaluation.
Li Z; Fang S; Zhang R; Yu L; Zhang J; Bu D; Sun L; Zhao Y; Li J
J Mol Diagn; 2021 Mar; 23(3):285-299. PubMed ID: 33346148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking the empirical accuracy of short-read sequencing across the M. tuberculosis genome.
Marin M; Vargas R; Harris M; Jeffrey B; Epperson LE; Durbin D; Strong M; Salfinger M; Iqbal Z; Akhundova I; Vashakidze S; Crudu V; Rosenthal A; Farhat MR
Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 38(7):1781-1787. PubMed ID: 35020793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ArCH: improving the performance of clonal hematopoiesis variant calling and interpretation.
Chan ICC; Panchot A; Schmidt E; McNulty S; Wiley BJ; Liu J; Turner K; Moukarzel L; Wong WSW; Tran D; Beeler JS; Batchi-Bouyou AL; Machiela MJ; Karyadi DM; Krajacich BJ; Zhao J; Kruglyak S; Lajoie B; Levy S; Patel M; Kantoff PW; Mason CE; Link DC; Druley TE; Stopsack KH; Bolton KL
Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 40(4):. PubMed ID: 38485690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ICR142 Benchmarker: evaluating, optimising and benchmarking variant calling performance using the ICR142 NGS validation series.
Ruark E; Holt E; Renwick A; Münz M; Wakeling M; Ellard S; Mahamdallie S; Yost S; Rahman N
Wellcome Open Res; 2018; 3():108. PubMed ID: 30483600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A community-based resource for automatic exome variant-calling and annotation in Mendelian disorders.
Mutarelli M; Marwah V; Rispoli R; Carrella D; Dharmalingam G; Oliva G; di Bernardo D
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. PubMed ID: 25078076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SimBA: A methodology and tools for evaluating the performance of RNA-Seq bioinformatic pipelines.
Audoux J; Salson M; Grosset CF; Beaumeunier S; Holder JM; Commes T; Philippe N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 18(1):428. PubMed ID: 28969586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. VariantDetective: an accurate all-in-one pipeline for detecting consensus bacterial SNPs and SVs.
Charron P; Kang M
Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 40(2):. PubMed ID: 38366603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. geck: trio-based comparative benchmarking of variant calls.
Kómár P; Kural D
Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 34(20):3488-3495. PubMed ID: 29850774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. VarGenius executes cohort-level DNA-seq variant calling and annotation and allows to manage the resulting data through a PostgreSQL database.
Musacchia F; Ciolfi A; Mutarelli M; Bruselles A; Castello R; Pinelli M; Basu S; Banfi S; Casari G; Tartaglia M; Nigro V;
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):477. PubMed ID: 30541431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels.
Zanti M; Michailidou K; Loizidou MA; Machattou C; Pirpa P; Christodoulou K; Spyrou GM; Kyriacou K; Hadjisavvas A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):218. PubMed ID: 33910496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. dv-trio: a family-based variant calling pipeline using DeepVariant.
Ip EKK; Hadinata C; Ho JWK; Giannoulatou E
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3549-3551. PubMed ID: 32315409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. vcfdist: accurately benchmarking phased small variant calls in human genomes.
Dunn T; Narayanasamy S
Nat Commun; 2023 Dec; 14(1):8149. PubMed ID: 38071244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
