These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38093237)
21. Cephalometric effects of Twin-block and van Beek Headgear-Activator in the correction of Class II malocclusion. Kirtane RS; Wiltshire WA; Thiruvenkatachari B; Shah A; Bittencourt Dutra Dos Santos P; Henrique de Sa Leitao Pinheiro F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 May; 163(5):677-689. PubMed ID: 36621351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Airway and hard tissue dimensions in children treated with early and later timed cervical headgear-a randomized controlled trial. Julku J; Pirilä-Parkkinen K; Pirttiniemi P Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):285-295. PubMed ID: 29228206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical effects of twin-block combined with maxillary expansion on the upper airway in adolescents with Class II malocclusion. Zhao H; Sun R; Cao S; Han J Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jul; 28(8):442. PubMed ID: 39046570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects. Ghodke S; Utreja AK; Singh SP; Jena AK Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):68. PubMed ID: 25534004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response. Kumar SA; Shetty KS; Prakash AT Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e50-9. PubMed ID: 23646338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cephalometric evaluation of pharyngeal airway and tongue space following treatment with Herbst and AdvanSync appliances : A prospective randomized clinical trial. Arora S; Grover S; Harikrishnan P; Dabas A; Dogra N; Nindra J J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):7-18. PubMed ID: 36853337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance--a retrospective cephalometric study. Kinzinger G; Czapka K; Ludwig B; Glasl B; Gross U; Lisson J J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Aug; 72(4):301-20. PubMed ID: 21898196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes. Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 21411476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Management of skeletal class II malocclusion using bimaxillary skeletal anchorage supported fixed functional appliances : A novel technique. Kochar GD; Londhe SM; Shivpuri A; Chopra SS; Mitra R; Verma M J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jan; 82(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 32577768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Volumetric Evaluation of Pharyngeal Airway after Functional Therapy. Yıldırım E; Karaçay Ş Scanning; 2021; 2021():6694992. PubMed ID: 33680278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances? Wu Y; Yu Q; Xia Y; Wang B; Chen S; Gu K; Zhang B; Zhu M BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 36732724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between clear aligners and twin-block in treating class II malocclusion in children: a retrospective study. He J; Hu L; Yuan Y; Wang P; Zheng F; Jiang H; Li W J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Sep; 48(5):125-130. PubMed ID: 39275829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance. de Abreu Vigorito F; Dominguez GC; de Arruda Aidar LA Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24713559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cephalometric analysis of dental and skeletal effects of Carriere Motion 3D appliance for Class II malocclusion. Luca L; Francesca C; Daniela G; Alfredo SG; Giuseppe S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May; 161(5):659-665. PubMed ID: 34996664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion. Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients]. Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Jena AK; Singh SP; Utreja AK Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):728-34. PubMed ID: 23241007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of Twin-block Appliance on Pharyngeal Airway, Sleep Patterns, and Lung Volume in Children with Class II Malocclusion. Batra A; Shetty V J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Jan; 23(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 35656660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]