These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38093607)

  • 1. Single-Level Anterolateral and Posterior Interbody Fusion Techniques are Associated With Equivalent Long-Term Lumbar Reoperations.
    Narendran N; Nilssen PK; Skaggs DL; Kim SD; Perry TG; Mikhail CM; Tuchman A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Sep; 49(17):1241-1247. PubMed ID: 38093607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS, and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients.
    Bains RR; Royse KE; Fennessy J; Norheim EP; Tabaraee E; Harris JE; Kuo CC; Guppy KH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Jun; 40(6):733-740. PubMed ID: 38457789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
    Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of lumbar interbody fusion surgery on postoperative outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Analysis of the US national inpatient sample.
    Ye YP; Hu JW; Zhang YG; Xu H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 70():20-26. PubMed ID: 31630917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).
    Rathbone J; Rackham M; Nielsen D; Lee SM; Hing W; Riar S; Scott-Young M
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1911-1926. PubMed ID: 37071155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF.
    Teng I; Han J; Phan K; Mobbs R
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():11-17. PubMed ID: 28676316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Surgical Approach on Sagittal Plane Alignment in Patients Undergoing One- or Two- Level Fusions for Degenerative Pathology: A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation 6 Months Following Surgery.
    Leveque JA; Drolet CE; Nemani V; Krause KL; Shen J; Rathore A; Baig Y; Louie PK
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e311-e317. PubMed ID: 35490888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
    Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Chen M; Cui J; Liu Y; Cai Z; Yang C; Liu H; Chen Y; Yao Z
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 38287376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
    Mehta VA; McGirt MJ; Garcés Ambrossi GL; Parker SL; Sciubba DM; Bydon A; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Witham TF
    Neurol Res; 2011 Jan; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Liu J; Deng H; Long X; Chen X; Xu R; Liu Z
    Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 26126415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.