These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38094288)

  • 1. Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography on Exfoliated Buccal Epithelial Cells.
    Jahanshahiafshar Z; Ghorbani H; Seyedmajidi M; Nabahati M; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K; Seyedmajidi S; Moudi E
    Iran J Med Sci; 2023 Nov; 48(6):572-581. PubMed ID: 38094288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of cone beam computed tomography in children.
    Altoukhi DH; Alaki S; El Ashiry E; Nassif O; Sabbahi D
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):427. PubMed ID: 34481467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity effects of x-rays on the oral mucosa epithelium at different fields of view: A cone beam computed tomography technique.
    Faeli Ghadikolaei R; Ghorbani H; Seyedmajidi M; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K; Moudi E; Seyedmajidi S
    Caspian J Intern Med; 2023; 14(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 36741479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and immunohistochemical expression of p53 in the oral mucosal epithelium of adults following cone-beam computed tomography.
    Mosavat F; Mahdavi N; Safari S
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2022; 879-880():503496. PubMed ID: 35914862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of mutagenic effects of two cone-beam computed tomography in oral mucosa cells.
    Ayres LCG; Dos Santos MAL; da Mota Santana LA; Avanci LDS; Souza DV; Lima BNS; Soares AF; Sousa SF; Trento CL; Ribeiro DA; Takeshita WM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Dec; 51(12):729-734. PubMed ID: 37533363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cytogenetic biomonitoring in individuals exposed to cone beam CT: comparison among exfoliated buccal mucosa cells, cells of tongue and epithelial gingival cells.
    Yang P; Hao S; Gong X; Li G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160413. PubMed ID: 28186847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
    Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma.
    Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Singer G; Riccabona M; Sorantin E
    Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Dec; 49(12):1939-1949. PubMed ID: 32535775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand.
    Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Gerstmair A; Krauss T; Reising K; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Voigt J
    Rofo; 2016 May; 188(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 26981913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomonitoring of DNA damage and cytotoxicity in individuals exposed to cone beam computed tomography.
    Carlin V; Artioli AJ; Matsumoto MA; Filho HN; Borgo E; Oshima CT; Ribeiro DA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):295-9. PubMed ID: 20587654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of X-rays in the oral mucosa epithelium of adults subjected to cone beam CT.
    da Fonte JB; Andrade TM; Albuquerque RL; de Melo MFB; Takeshita WM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170160. PubMed ID: 29091472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value of Latest-generation Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Post Lipiodol-embolization Imaging in Hepatic Transarterial Chemoembolization in Comparison with Multi-detector Computed Tomography.
    Alizadeh LS; Koch V; Vogl TJ; Yel I; Gruenewald L; Albrecht MH; Herrmann E; von Knebel-Doeberitz PL; Booz C
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):e109-e118. PubMed ID: 34598867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in patients submitted to ionizing radiation.
    Lorenzoni DC; Fracalossi AC; Carlin V; Ribeiro DA; Sant'anna EF
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jan; 83(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 22656641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of liver ablation using cone beam computed tomography.
    Abdel-Rehim M; Ronot M; Sibert A; Vilgrain V
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 21(2):517-24. PubMed ID: 25593467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
    Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D cone-beam CT with a twin robotic x-ray system in elbow imaging: comparison of image quality to high-resolution multidetector CT.
    Grunz JP; Weng AM; Kunz AS; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Schmitt R; Gietzen CH; Pennig L; Herz S; Ergün S; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Sep; 4(1):52. PubMed ID: 32895778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Associated With Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Follow-up Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs.
    Steuwe A; Geisbüsch P; Schulz CJ; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
    J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Aug; 23(4):583-92. PubMed ID: 27193306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does cone-beam computed tomography examination increase the micronuclei frequency in the oral mucosa exfoliated cells? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang P; Xuan B; Li G; Qi S
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 36841769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
    Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Apfaltrer G; Riccabona M; Singer G; Stücklschweiger G; Guss H; Sorantin E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178747. PubMed ID: 28570626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.