These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3809429)
1. The departmental use of the microcomputer. Czaplinska J Radiography; 1986; 52(604):191-2. PubMed ID: 3809429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Filing in a radiology department: value of a microcomputer]. Bloch P; Vouge M Ann Radiol (Paris); 1985; 28(7):563-6. PubMed ID: 3840968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Aspects of computer technology in departmental administration. Spencer KA Radiography; 1985; 51(599):277-80. PubMed ID: 4048417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Record filing in a department of radiology. Value of a microcomputer]. Bloch P; Vouge M J Radiol; 1984 Oct; 65(10):697-9. PubMed ID: 6527338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the micro to accurately allocate a hospital's departmental overhead. Linder CA Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Feb; 40(2):56-61. PubMed ID: 10278363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. tAnReDos--a circle application in evolution. Decoussemaker L; Vaes L Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1987; 38(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 3591270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computers in control. Grech P Health Soc Serv J; 1982 Apr; 92(4790):409-10. PubMed ID: 10255144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A program for department daily performance using the personal computer. Chenchick K Radiol Manage; 1985 Sep; 7(4):13-5. PubMed ID: 10281497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computer system to monitor radiology department activity: a management tool to improve patient care. Jost RG; Rodewald SS; Hill RL; Evens RG Radiology; 1982 Nov; 145(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 7134433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The total digital radiology department: an alternative view. Seeley GW; Ovitt T; Capp MP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Feb; 144(2):421-2. PubMed ID: 3871292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Total digital radiology: is it feasible or desirable? A response. Gray JE; Karsell PR; Becker GP; Gehring DG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Feb; 144(2):436. PubMed ID: 3871294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A program for technologist rejection rate using the home computer. Cottrell GA Radiol Manage; 1985 Sep; 7(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10281498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Total digital radiology: is it feasible? Or desirable? Gray JE; Karsell PR; Becker GP; Gehring DG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1345-9. PubMed ID: 6333802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Software for the personal computer. Monthly productivity reporting. Rubenzer BF Radiol Manage; 1986 Jan; 8(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10278382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are films going out of fashion? Jessop J Health Serv J; 1987 Sep; 97(5066):1021. PubMed ID: 10284194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the CAP microcomputer-based SNOMED encoding system. Harry DJ; Hokanson JA; Slavin RE; Todd MR Pathologist; 1983 May; 37(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 10278181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organising a microcomputer system for departmental use--a personal experience. Cheong SK Malays J Pathol; 1988 Aug; 10():15-20. PubMed ID: 3252073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]