These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3809504)

  • 1. Digital gastrointestinal imaging: the effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities.
    Kastan DJ; Ackerman LV; Feczko PJ
    Radiology; 1987 Mar; 162(3):853-6. PubMed ID: 3809504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Double-contrast enema. Study of the mucosal pattern and the organ profile with conventional and digital methods].
    Perri G; Palla L; Battolla L; Tagliagambe A; D'Alessandro F; Torri T; Benocci G; Lambruschi G; Napoli V; Barbieri L
    Radiol Med; 1991 Jun; 81(6):844-8. PubMed ID: 1857793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Sabeti V; Solomon SL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3940383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases.
    Lams PM; Cocklin ML
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 3940365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital radiography of the gastrointestinal tract.
    Feczko PJ; Ackerman LV; Kastan DJ; Halpert RD
    Gastrointest Radiol; 1988 Jul; 13(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 3384261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Discreet mucosal changes in the colon (author's transl)].
    Cen M; Frik W; Karhoff B; Ariyama J
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 Jan; 120(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 4363140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption.
    Murphey MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Mar; 152(3):541-6. PubMed ID: 2783807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
    Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Digital image intensifier radiography: imaging qualities and initial use in the gastrointestinal area].
    Busch HP; Strauss LG; Prager P; Georgi M
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1986 Jun; 6(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 3524964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus film-digitized radiography.
    Kido S; Ikezoe J; Takeuchi N; Kondoh H; Johkoh T; Kohno N; Tomiyama N; Yamagami H; Naito H; Arisawa J
    Radiology; 1994 Jul; 192(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 8208932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging.
    Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ; Pond GD; Carmody RF; Johnson JE; Ferrell WR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Mar; 152(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 2644773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose requirements in direct and indirect radiography with high-resolution X-ray image-intensifier tubes.
    Schuster W; Heinrich H
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1974; 17(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 4447317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of endoscopy and double-contrast radiography in the early stages of ulcerative and granulomatous colitis.
    Laufer I; Mullens JE; Hamilton J
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1244637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Detection of small bone lesions with digital radiography using storage phosphors].
    Salvini E; Zincone G; Fossati N; Crivellaro M; Crespi A; Loda A; Paruccini N; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 2057602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Air contrast studies of the colon in inflammatory bowel disease.
    Laufer I
    CRC Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1977 Aug; 9(4):421-47. PubMed ID: 330112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digitization of conventional x-ray films].
    Wenz W; Buitrago-Tellez C; Blum U; Hauenstein KH; Gufler H; Meyer E; Rüdiger K
    Radiologe; 1992 Sep; 32(9):409-15. PubMed ID: 1438723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nondisplaced fractures: spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging.
    Murphey MD; Bramble JM; Cook LT; Martin NL; Dwyer SJ
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):865-70. PubMed ID: 2305071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.