BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3809514)

  • 1. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.
    Wolochow MS
    Radiology; 1987 Mar; 162(3):879-80. PubMed ID: 3809514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.
    Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of an interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications on digitized film-screen mammograms.
    Leichter I; Lederman R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S; Buchbinder SS
    Invest Radiol; 1999 Jun; 34(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 10353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
    Higashida Y; Moribe N; Morita K; Katsuda N; Hatemura M; Takada T; Takahashi M; Yamashita J
    Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 1561354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
    Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications.
    Kim HS; Han BK; Choo KS; Jeon YH; Kim JH; Choe YH
    Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 16374078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Funke M; Grabbe EH
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a dual-screen, dual-emulsion mammography system.
    Jackson VP; Harrill CD; White SJ; Gillespie KR; Mail JT; Katz BP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Mar; 152(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 2783800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
    Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications.
    Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):913-8. PubMed ID: 6981974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic screening of plain film mammography.
    Fredfeldt KE; Christensen E; Conradsen K; Ersbøll B; Stedstrup S
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1992 Apr; 13(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 1599731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Highly regular wavelets for the detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Lemaur G; Drouiche K; DeConinck J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 12760556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial resolution in digital mammography.
    Karssemeijer N; Frieling JT; Hendriks JH
    Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 8496034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications.
    de Paredes ES; Abbitt PL; Tabbarah S; Bickers MA; Smith DC
    Radiographics; 1990 Jul; 10(4):577-89. PubMed ID: 2377764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications.
    Chan HP; Niklason LT; Ikeda DM; Lam KL; Adler DD
    Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1203-11. PubMed ID: 7968855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An adaptive algorithm for the detection of microcalcifications in simulated low-dose mammography.
    Treiber O; Wanninger F; Führ H; Panzer W; Regulla D; Winkler G
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 12630741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The film-mammographic demonstration of micro-calcification (author's transl)].
    Klein J
    Rofo; 1979 Aug; 131(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 157957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].
    Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Schorn C; Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 10962993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.