142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38095661)
1. [Strength of the taper junction of modular revision hip stems : The influence of contamination of the taper junction and the joining condition on the relative motion and pull-off force between the stem and neck part of the MRP prosthesis].
Boettcher JM; Sellenschloh K; Strube A; Huber G; Morlock MM
Orthopadie (Heidelb); 2024 Jan; 53(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 38095661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is taper corrosion in modular revision hip stem junctions associated with patient or implant specific factors? A retrieval analysis.
Bormann T; Kretzer JP; Jaeger S; Lohmann CH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106326. PubMed ID: 38141361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Influence of Contamination and Cleaning on the Strength of Modular Head Taper Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Krull A; Morlock MM; Bishop NE
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3200-3205. PubMed ID: 28625686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Micromotion at the head-stem taper junction of total hip prostheses is influenced by prosthesis design-, patient- and surgeon-related factors.
Falkenberg A; Biller S; Morlock MM; Huber G
J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109424. PubMed ID: 31676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-reinforced poly(ether ether ketone) and polyethylene composite gaskets for prevention of mechanically-assisted corrosion in modular taper junctions: Seating, micromotion and short-term fretting corrosion.
Ouellette ES; Smith SM; Gilbert JL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 119():104454. PubMed ID: 33826987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of local micromotion at the stem-neck taper junction of a bi-modular total hip prosthesis design.
Falkenberg A; Drummen P; Morlock MM; Huber G
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Mar; 65():31-38. PubMed ID: 30679024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Seating Load Magnitude on Incremental Cyclic Fretting Corrosion in 5°40' Mixed Alloy Modular Taper Junctions.
Pierre D; Swaminathan V; Scholl LY; TenHuisen K; Gilbert JL
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1953-1961. PubMed ID: 29486910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do SiNx coatings bear the potential to reduce the risk of micromotion in modular taper junctions?
Haschke H; Falkenberg A; Morlock MM; Huber G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Sep; 234(9):897-908. PubMed ID: 32507037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HOW TO AVOID FRACTURE OF THE LOCKING SCREW IN MODULAR REVISION ARTHROPLASTY OF THE HIP USING THE MRP TITAN REVISION SYSTEM.
Semmelmann T; Schuh A; Rottmann H; Schröder R; Fleischmann C; Sesselmann S
Georgian Med News; 2023 Feb; (335):32-35. PubMed ID: 37042585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors influencing taper failure of modular revision hip stems.
Krull A; Morlock MM; Bishop NE
Med Eng Phys; 2018 Apr; 54():65-73. PubMed ID: 29500122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of trunnion roughness and length on the modular taper junction strength under typical intraoperative assembly forces.
Jauch-Matt SY; Miles AW; Gill HS
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Jan; 39():94-101. PubMed ID: 27913177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative assembly of anatomical shoulder prosthesis frequently results in malalignment of the modular taper junction.
Herbster M; Berth A; Märtens N; Robra M; Welzel F; Dallmann F; Lohmann CH; Halle T; Bertrand J; Döring J
J Orthop Res; 2021 Nov; 39(11):2485-2496. PubMed ID: 33368644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Model validation for estimating taper microgroove deformation during total hip arthroplasty head-neck assembly.
Godoy M; Gustafson JA; Hertzler JS; Bischoff JE; Pourzal R; Lundberg HJ
J Biomech; 2022 Jul; 140():111172. PubMed ID: 35696772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Taper junctions in modular hip joint replacements: What affects their stability?
Mueller U; Bormann T; Schroeder S; Kretzer JP
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Apr; 116():104258. PubMed ID: 33497961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assembly force and taper angle difference influence the relative motion at the stem-neck interface of bi-modular hip prostheses.
Haschke H; Jauch-Matt SY; Sellenschloh K; Huber G; Morlock MM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):690-9. PubMed ID: 27170535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions?
Pourzal R; Hall DJ; Ha NQ; Urban RM; Levine BR; Jacobs JJ; Lundberg HJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2232-42. PubMed ID: 27339123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of flexural rigidity on micromotion at the head-stem taper interface of modular hip prostheses.
Haschke H; Konow T; Huber G; Morlock MM
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jun; 68():1-10. PubMed ID: 30981609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design, Material, and Seating Load Effects on In Vitro Fretting Corrosion Performance of Modular Head-Neck Tapers.
Ouellette ES; Mali SA; Kim J; Grostefon J; Gilbert JL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 May; 34(5):991-1002. PubMed ID: 30827717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement--a biomechanical and retrieval analysis.
Schramm M; Wirtz DC; Holzwarth U; Pitto RP
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2000 Apr; 45(4):105-9. PubMed ID: 10829545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insights into Imprinting: How Is the Phenomenon of Tribocorrosion at Head-Neck Taper Interfaces Related to Corrosion, Fretting, and Implant Design Parameters?
Bormann T; Müller U; Gibmeier J; Mai PT; Renkawitz T; Kretzer JP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 480(8):1585-1600. PubMed ID: 35383614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]