161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38095670)
21. [
Zanoni L; Bianchi L; Nanni C; Pultrone C; Giunchi F; Bossert I; Matti A; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M; Romagnoli D; Fonti C; Lodi F; D'Errico A; Brunocilla E; Porreca A; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Dec; 49(1):390-409. PubMed ID: 34213609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDG PET-CT Scans in the Evaluation of Primary Tumors and Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Zhou Z; Wang Z; Zhang B; Wu Y; Li G; Wang Z
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():727327. PubMed ID: 34539577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is FDG-PET/CT used correctly in the combined approach for nodal staging in NSCLC patients?
Simsek FS; Comak A; Asik M; Kuslu D; Balci TA; Ulutas H; Koroglu R; Kekilli E; Akatli A; Elmali F; Yalcin NC; Akyol H
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jun; 23(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 32525121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer.
Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic accuracy of [
Mingels C; Bohn KP; Rominger A; Afshar-Oromieh A; Alberts I
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jun; 49(7):2436-2444. PubMed ID: 35067735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Herbrik M; Treffert J; Geiger B; Riegger C; Hartung V; Rosenbaum-Krumme SJ; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1520-5. PubMed ID: 21908390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [
Ferrari C; Santo G; Mammucci P; Rubini D; Sciacqua A; Sardaro A; Pisani AR; Rubini G
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Feb; 23(1):34. PubMed ID: 36814217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of total-body 2-[
Chen X; Hu P; Yu H; Tan H; He Y; Cao S; Zhou Y; Shi H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):7890-7898. PubMed ID: 37338551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [18F]fluoromethylcholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a prospective study of 210 patients.
Poulsen MH; Bouchelouche K; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Petersen H; Gerke O; Steffansen SI; Marcussen N; Svolgaard N; Vach W; Geertsen U; Walter S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1666-71. PubMed ID: 22520686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Combined [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and low-dose 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT using a long-axial field of view scanner for patients referred for [177Lu]-PSMA-radioligand therapy.
Alberts I; Schepers R; Zeimpekis K; Sari H; Rominger A; Afshar-Oromieh A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Feb; 50(3):951-956. PubMed ID: 36136102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic performance of preoperative [
Rufini V; Garganese G; Ieria FP; Pasciuto T; Fragomeni SM; Gui B; Florit A; Inzani F; Zannoni GF; Scambia G; Giordano A; Collarino A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Sep; 48(10):3303-3314. PubMed ID: 33619601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: A preliminary comparison trial of whole-body PET/MRI versus PET/CT.
Ruhlmann V; Ruhlmann M; Bellendorf A; Grueneisen J; Sawicki LM; Grafe H; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Umutlu L
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 27776644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 30473166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Koeninger A; Hartung V; Otterbach F; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 23002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology results by FDG PET-CT for lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Peltenburg B; de Keizer B; Dankbaar JW; de Boer M; Willems SM; Philippens MEP; Terhaard CHJ; de Bree R
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 30489180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36.
Taralli S; Scolozzi V; Foti M; Ricciardi S; Forcione AR; Cardillo G; Calcagni ML
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 30535767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contribution of
Ceylan Y; Ömür Ö; Hatipoğlu F
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2018 Feb; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 29393049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods.
Kresnik E; Mikosch P; Gallowitsch HJ; Kogler D; Wiesser S; Heinisch M; Unterweger O; Raunik W; Kumnig G; Gomez I; Grünbacher G; Lind P
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 28(7):816-21. PubMed ID: 11504077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dynamic FDG-PET imaging for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer.
Wumener X; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Zhang M; Zang Z; Huang B; Liu M; Huang S; Huang Y; Wang P; Liang Y; Sun T
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1005924. PubMed ID: 36439506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan compared to CT-scan alone for lymph node staging before radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer.
Moussa M; Chakra MA; Saad W; Dellis A; Papatsoris A
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):833.e9-833.e17. PubMed ID: 34059435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
