These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38095989)

  • 1. Measures of metacognitive efficiency across cognitive models of decision confidence.
    Rausch M; Hellmann S; Zehetleitner M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38095989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are the contributions of processing experience and prior beliefs to confidence ratings domain-general or domain-specific?
    Hu X; Yang C; Luo L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 35708950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HMeta-d: hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings.
    Fleming SM
    Neurosci Conscious; 2017; 2017(1):nix007. PubMed ID: 29877507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training.
    Carpenter J; Sherman MT; Kievit RA; Seth AK; Lau H; Fleming SM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 30596440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for Age-Equivalent and Task-Dissociative Metacognition in the Memory Domain.
    Zakrzewski AC; Sanders EC; Berry JM
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():630143. PubMed ID: 33633653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the assumptions behind metacognitive measurements: Implications for theory and practice.
    Miyoshi K; Sakamoto Y; Nishida S
    J Vis; 2022 Sep; 22(10):18. PubMed ID: 36149676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.
    Mazancieux A; Fleming SM; Souchay C; Moulin CJA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1788-1799. PubMed ID: 32191079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How experimental procedures influence estimates of metacognitive ability.
    Rahnev D; Fleming SM
    Neurosci Conscious; 2019; 2019(1):niz009. PubMed ID: 31198586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of metacognition on signal-detection theoretic models.
    Barrett AB; Dienes Z; Seth AK
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Dec; 18(4):535-52. PubMed ID: 24079931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring metacognition of direct and indirect parameters of voluntary movement.
    Arbuzova P; Peters C; Röd L; Koß C; Maurer H; Maurer LK; Müller H; Verrel J; Filevich E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Nov; 150(11):2208-2229. PubMed ID: 33900097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognitive Performance on Memory and Visuospatial Tasks in Functional Cognitive Disorder.
    Pennington C; Ball H; Swirski M; Newson M; Coulthard E
    Brain Sci; 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34679432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metacognitive domain specificity in feeling-of-knowing but not retrospective confidence.
    Mazancieux A; Dinze C; Souchay C; Moulin CJA
    Neurosci Conscious; 2020; 2020(1):niaa001. PubMed ID: 32123576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-dose cone-beam CT via raw counts domain low-signal correction schemes: Performance assessment and task-based parameter optimization (Part II. Task-based parameter optimization).
    Gomez-Cardona D; Hayes JW; Zhang R; Li K; Cruz-Bastida JP; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1957-1969. PubMed ID: 29532480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The variance of d' estimates obtained in yes-no and two-interval forced choice procedures.
    Jesteadt W
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 15912873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On why we lack confidence in some signal-detection-based analyses of confidence.
    Arnold DH; Johnston A; Adie J; Yarrow K
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Aug; 113():103532. PubMed ID: 37295196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain.
    Beck B; Peña-Vivas V; Fleming S; Haggard P
    Cognition; 2019 May; 186():32-41. PubMed ID: 30739057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory test A-Not A rating signal detection: Panel's sensory learning and stability of decision criteria.
    Choi ES; Lee HL; Kwon BK; Kim MA; Lee HS
    Food Res Int; 2023 May; 167():112592. PubMed ID: 37087202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.
    Shekhar M; Rahnev D
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Jan; 128(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 32673034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postdecision Evidence Integration and Depressive Symptoms.
    Moses-Payne ME; Rollwage M; Fleming SM; Roiser JP
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():639. PubMed ID: 31607959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory noise increases metacognitive efficiency.
    Bang JW; Shekhar M; Rahnev D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):437-452. PubMed ID: 30382720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.