243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38096014)
1. Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 as a Source of COVID-19 Information: Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Generative and Authoritative Information.
Wang G; Gao K; Liu Q; Wu Y; Zhang K; Zhou W; Guo C
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e49771. PubMed ID: 38096014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e56655. PubMed ID: 38630520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.
Giannakopoulos K; Kavadella A; Aaqel Salim A; Stamatopoulos V; Kaklamanos EG
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51580. PubMed ID: 38009003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Does ChatGPT Use Source Information Compared With Google? A Text Network Analysis of Online Health Information.
Shen OY; Pratap JS; Li X; Chen NC; Bhashyam AR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 482(4):578-588. PubMed ID: 38517757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI.
Mediboina A; Badam RK; Chodavarapu S
Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e51544. PubMed ID: 38318564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Current Status of Artificial Intelligence for Endourology Patient Education: A Blind Comparison of ChatGPT and Google Bard Against Traditional Information Resources.
Connors C; Gupta K; Khusid JA; Khargi R; Yaghoubian AJ; Levy M; Gallante B; Atallah W; Gupta M
J Endourol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38441078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial intelligence large language model ChatGPT: is it a trustworthy and reliable source of information for sarcoma patients?
Valentini M; Szkandera J; Smolle MA; Scheipl S; Leithner A; Andreou D
Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1303319. PubMed ID: 38584922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
ArXiv; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38529075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is ChatGPT accurate and reliable in answering questions regarding head and neck cancer?
Kuşcu O; Pamuk AE; Sütay Süslü N; Hosal S
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1256459. PubMed ID: 38107064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unveiling the ChatGPT phenomenon: Evaluating the consistency and accuracy of endodontic question answers.
Suárez A; Díaz-Flores García V; Algar J; Gómez Sánchez M; Llorente de Pedro M; Freire Y
Int Endod J; 2024 Jan; 57(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 37814369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing ChatGPT ability to answer laypeople questions about cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Scquizzato T; Semeraro F; Swindell P; Simpson R; Angelini M; Gazzato A; Sajjad U; Bignami EG; Landoni G; Keeble TR; Mion M
Resuscitation; 2024 Jan; 194():110077. PubMed ID: 38081504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.
Cheng SL; Tsai SJ; Bai YM; Ko CH; Hsu CW; Yang FC; Tsai CK; Tu YK; Yang SN; Tseng PT; Hsu TW; Liang CS; Su KP
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51229. PubMed ID: 38145486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is ChatGPT an Accurate and Reliable Source of Information for Patients with Vaccine and Statin Hesitancy?
Torun C; Sarmis A; Oguz A
Medeni Med J; 2024 Mar; 39(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 38511678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical knowledge of ChatGPT in public health, infectious diseases, COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccines: multiple choice questions examination based performance.
Meo SA; Alotaibi M; Meo MZS; Meo MOS; Hamid M
Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1360597. PubMed ID: 38711764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ChatGPT's performance in German OB/GYN exams - paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice.
Riedel M; Kaefinger K; Stuehrenberg A; Ritter V; Amann N; Graf A; Recker F; Klein E; Kiechle M; Riedel F; Meyer B
Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1296615. PubMed ID: 38155661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advancing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Knowledge Retrieval: A Case Study Using ChatGPT-4 and Link Retrieval Plug-In to Analyze Diabetic Ketoacidosis Guidelines.
Hamed E; Sharif A; Eid A; Alfehaidi A; Alberry M
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41916. PubMed ID: 37457604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probing artificial intelligence in neurosurgical training: ChatGPT takes a neurosurgical residents written exam.
Bartoli A; May AT; Al-Awadhi A; Schaller K
Brain Spine; 2024; 4():102715. PubMed ID: 38163001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can ChatGPT, an Artificial Intelligence Language Model, Provide Accurate and High-quality Patient Information on Prostate Cancer?
Coskun B; Ocakoglu G; Yetemen M; Kaygisiz O
Urology; 2023 Oct; 180():35-58. PubMed ID: 37406864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial intelligence performance in clinical neurology queries: the ChatGPT model.
Altunisik E; Firat YE; Cengiz EK; Comruk GB
Neurol Res; 2024 May; 46(5):437-443. PubMed ID: 38522424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
