141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38096319)
1. Human arm endpoint-impedance in rhythmic human-robot interaction exhibits cyclic variations.
Fortineau V; Siegler IA; Makarov M; Rodriguez-Ayerbe P
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295640. PubMed ID: 38096319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving Stability in Upper Limb Rehabilitation Using Variable Stiffness.
Jujjavarapu SS; Esfahani ET
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():122-125. PubMed ID: 31945859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complementary spatial and timing control in rhythmic arm movements.
Nickl RW; Ankarali MM; Cowan NJ
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Apr; 121(4):1543-1560. PubMed ID: 30811263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A force-controlled planar haptic device for movement control analysis of the human arm.
de Vlugt E; Schouten AC; van der Helm FC; Teerhuis PC; Brouwn GG
J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Oct; 129(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 14511818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Collision avoidance analysis of human-robot physical interaction based on null-space impedance control of a dynamic reference arm plane.
Sun Q; Guo S; Fei S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Aug; 61(8):2077-2090. PubMed ID: 37326802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stochastic estimation of human arm impedance under nonlinear friction in robot joints: a model study.
Chang PH; Kang SH
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 189(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 20298718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the adiabatic transformability hypothesis in a ball-bouncing task. mbrodel@freewwweb.com.
Broderick MP; Pavis B; Newell KM
Biol Cybern; 2000 May; 82(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 10836588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaction force and motion estimators facilitating impedance control of the upper limb rehabilitation robot.
Mancisidor A; Zubizarreta A; Cabanes I; Bengoa P; Jung JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():561-566. PubMed ID: 28813879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards functional robotic training: motor learning of dynamic tasks is enhanced by haptic rendering but hampered by arm weight support.
Özen Ö; Buetler KA; Marchal-Crespo L
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 35152897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a Planar Haptic Robot With Minimized Impedance.
Oh K; Rymer WZ; Plenzio I; Mussa-Ivaldi FA; Park S; Choi J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 May; 68(5):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 33206599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding Haptic Feedback to Virtual Environments With a Cable-Driven Robot Improves Upper Limb Spatio-Temporal Parameters During a Manual Handling Task.
Faure C; Fortin-Cote A; Robitaille N; Cardou P; Gosselin C; Laurendeau D; Mercier C; Bouyer L; McFadyen BJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Oct; 28(10):2246-2254. PubMed ID: 32877337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of reaching movements of upper arm in robot assisted exercises. Kinematic assessment of robot assisted upper arm reaching single-joint movements.
Iuppariello L; D'Addio G; Romano M; Bifulco P; Lanzillo B; Pappone N; Cesarelli M
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2016; 38(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 27459844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Movement strategy and EMG activities of the upper extremity at assisted reaching exercise with a 7 DOF collaborative robot.
Kato Y; Olensek A; Zadravec M; Matjacic Z; Tsuji T; Cikajlo I
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():4886-4889. PubMed ID: 33019084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impedance Control of a 2-DOF Spherical 5-Bar Exoskeleton for Physical Human-Robot Interaction During Rehabilitation and Assessment.
Wolbrecht E; Ketkar V; Perry JC
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the effect of muscular cocontraction on the 3-D human arm impedance.
Patel H; O'Neill G; Artemiadis P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Oct; 61(10):2602-8. PubMed ID: 24835125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Model of rhythmic ball bouncing using a visually controlled neural oscillator.
Avrin G; Siegler IA; Makarov M; Rodriguez-Ayerbe P
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 118(4):2470-2482. PubMed ID: 28794190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic Modeling and Interactive Performance of PARM: A Parallel Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Using Impedance Control for Patients after Stroke.
Guang H; Ji L; Shi Y; Misgeld BJE
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():8647591. PubMed ID: 29850004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance-based robotic assistance during rhythmic arm exercises.
Leconte P; Ronsse R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 13(1):82. PubMed ID: 27623806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic gaming prototype for upper limb exercise: Effects of age and embodiment on user preferences and movement.
Eizicovits D; Edan Y; Tabak I; Levy-Tzedek S
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(2):261-274. PubMed ID: 29526862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted training compared with an enhanced upper limb therapy programme and with usual care for upper limb functional limitation after stroke: the RATULS three-group RCT.
Rodgers H; Bosomworth H; Krebs HI; van Wijck F; Howel D; Wilson N; Finch T; Alvarado N; Ternent L; Fernandez-Garcia C; Aird L; Andole S; Cohen DL; Dawson J; Ford GA; Francis R; Hogg S; Hughes N; Price CI; Turner DL; Vale L; Wilkes S; Shaw L
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Oct; 24(54):1-232. PubMed ID: 33140719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
