126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38096562)
21. Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for "low-risk" early-stage cervical cancer: A propensity-score based analysis.
Di Donato V; Bogani G; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Malzoni M; Falcone F; Petrillo M; Capobianco G; Calò F; D'Augè TG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Ervas E; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F; Sopracordevole F; Vizza E; Giannini A
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():49-54. PubMed ID: 37149905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Kwon BS; Roh HJ; Lee S; Yang J; Song YJ; Lee SH; Kim KH; Suh DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):642-648. PubMed ID: 33041070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Chua PT; Mendoza MCVR; Lee PS; Lai SY
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 33966729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. ASO Author Reflections: Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes.
Zanagnolo V; Aloisi A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):1830-1831. PubMed ID: 32851515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy can be routinely used for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a single-institute experience with 404 patients.
Yang L; Cai J; Dong W; Shen Y; Xiong Z; Wang H; Min J; Li G; Wang Z
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 25281840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study.
Zaccarini F; Santy A; Dabi Y; Lavoue V; Carcopino X; Bendifallah S; Benbara A; Collinet P; Canlorbe G; Raimond E; Graesslin O; Ouldamer L; Daraï E; Huchon C; Golfier F; Touboul C; Bolze PA
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 50(2):102046. PubMed ID: 33340751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.
Wu X; Qiu L; Lou W; Wang X; Zhu T; Zhang Y; Hu W; Xue X; Zhu Z; Xiang L; Li J; Fang X; Gao S; Feng H; Diao W; Zhang H; Du M; Bai Y; Hou Y; Yan W; Feng H; Yu H; Zhu S; Du Y; Jiang H
Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):269. PubMed ID: 35395868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survival outcomes of single-port access laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Eoh KJ; Li LY; Shin W; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():140-145. PubMed ID: 32891319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Application of novel tumor-free techniques in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer.
Jing H; Ran X; Li Z
Asian J Surg; 2021 Aug; 44(8):1069-1072. PubMed ID: 34078579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Open radical hysterectomy: The new standard of care in early-stage cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Pareja R; Viveros-Carreño D; Frumovitz M
BJOG; 2023 Jul; 130(8):851-855. PubMed ID: 36681892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
